macbeth
Dismembered
Naylor just said no...
[tweet]1022765339107577858[/tweet]
Weren’t we also originally told no to O’Connell too? And now every tweet includes his name...
Naylor just said no...
[tweet]1022765339107577858[/tweet]
Naylor said No.Weren’t we also originally told no to O’Connell too? And now every tweet includes his name...
Then after that it was the Portuguese Murray that made himself at home in Morteza's pocket.
. Beware though, if you guys ever go through a struggling phase, you can be sure to see loads of "play morteza! " or "idiot manager!" Comments on social media.
[tweet]1022765339107577858[/tweet]
It's a shame Naylor also (like so many others on NSC) is peddling this nonsense that we *need* 8 HGP. That's the wrong way around - we're allowed a max of 17 non-HGP, so bringing this guy in would force an existing non-HGP out of the squad. And bringing him in on a free would mean we still have budget to go get new HGP should we feel we need to.
But then, given the source is Daily Mail I'm inclined to take his "no" at face value (for now).
It's a shame Naylor also (like so many others on NSC) is peddling this nonsense that we *need* 8 HGP. That's the wrong way around - we're allowed a max of 17 non-HGP, so bringing this guy in would force an existing non-HGP out of the squad. And bringing him in on a free would mean we still have budget to go get new HGP should we feel we need to.
But then, given the source is Daily Mail I'm inclined to take his "no" at face value (for now).
I don’t care what Andy Naylor says, 10 pages already, come on NSC, if we get it up to 300 plus pages , he’s ours.
Naylor's source is either the agent - who he just interviewed - or the club. The agent could easily have given an 'emphatic no' if the club had asked him to keep it quiet. The club will have their own tactical reasons for anything they say about transfer business.Naylor just said no...
[tweet]1022765339107577858[/tweet]
HGP is something we look at - The two back up Goalkeepers are now HGP, so that obviously shows that it might be an issue but I see it the other way. Some non HGP will be earmarked to leave so there may be legs in this transfer; however, there can only be a 25 man squad and you also need to be careful that too many players won't be heading off to the Asian Games during the season, so that would count against this transfer. Truth is, none of us know for sure.
Naylor's source is either the agent - who he just interviewed - or the club. The agent could easily have given an 'emphatic no' if the club had asked him to keep it quiet. The club will have their own tactical reasons for anything they say about transfer business.
In short, who knows ? I wouldn't rule it out.
Although, there is a reasonable chance the mail just made it up.
I want this to happen. Not least because it means we won't have caved in to Reading's absurd demands over Moore, and also means the chances of us keeping Baldock are higher (HGP).
I like Baldock, I like centre backs who play for their country, and I don't like Reading.
I can see where you're coming from but the agent wasn't exactly quiet about ARJ, in fact, he was encouraging the media interest with his tweets.
We must be keeping it quiet in case LEICESTER want a replacement for McGuire...
Read into this what you like, given Naylor has already said no, but this turkish guy who has 98k followers and looks fairly itk at Trabzonspor (the club Morteza was supposed to sign for) is claiming that we HAVE in fact stepped in.
https://twitter.com/yunusemresel/status/1022754658593525761
Given that this journalist has no need to speculate and name random teams, I would suggest that it shows we are in for him. But the deal is most likely in early stages hence why Naylor was told no.
Can I just say how nice it is to have Iranian fans on here to give us some insight and tips on potential signings. Long may you be Albion supporters, I hope you are all planning a visit to the Amex soon.