jackalbion
Well-known member
- Aug 30, 2011
- 4,894
Agree, why does his name need to be remembered? He can be forgotten about and never spoken of again, not giving him the legendary status he wanted. I suspect there’s another motive for Morrissey and O’Neill as why they want that particular name remembered.But those are all people who were subject to long running police investigations, person hunts and long trials. They were repeatedly in the news.
Manchester was a single, one off event, over in seconds in which the perpetrator died. It's good that his name died with him. He got neither his virgins in paradise nor the notoriety that might inspire others.
Why has Morrisey not written about 9/11? Higher death toll surely? Except that the people who ran that operation were known, hunted down and killed.
How many IRA bombers can you name without googling?