- Thread starter
- #301
I don't despise the rich. I believe that they, in general, could do more for society. Call it social responsibility.
This.
I don't despise the rich. I believe that they, in general, could do more for society. Call it social responsibility.
Just footballers.
Just checking
The Jermaine Defoe Foundation seems more about him than about the charity.
I get it, and I respect your honesty but the bit that troubles me is that you imply that because I despise rich hoarders that I'm jealous?
And as for the Stephen Ireland Foundation…...
The poor do not resent the rich purely because they are rich, I feel it is more down to fairness. Is it fair that a company can afford to employ staff on proper contracts on decent living wages but choose not to because they can get away with zero hour deals and the minimum wage? No it's not in my opinion.
So fairness includes what? Someone who earns great money has to share his hard earnt money with some lazy toad who can't be bothered to get out of bed but want's the same living standereds as the hard worker who works till he drops while the lazy toad scratches his arse and might get out of bed if the sun is shining?
So fairness includes what? Someone who earns great money has to share his hard earnt money with some lazy toad who can't be bothered to get out of bed but want's the same living standereds as the hard worker who works till he drops while the lazy toad scratches his arse and might get out of bed if the sun is shining?
It's okay, looks like average wages are going to be up 1.8% so there is no problem, definitely not. And growth is up, which absolutely proves that Osbourne's 'strategy' is correct.
So fairness includes what? Someone who earns great money has to share his hard earnt money with some lazy toad who can't be bothered to get out of bed but want's the same living standereds as the hard worker who works till he drops while the lazy toad scratches his arse and might get out of bed if the sun is shining?
So now EVERYONE has to earn enough to buy a house. Something that has never existed in history.
There are a few that are lazy and won't get out of bed, but parking arguments about why - what about the millions who work very hard or who want to work very hard? That's what some of us struggle with, the great inequality between those who work hard to be on the breadline and those who may work just as hard reap rewards that some can't even contemplate.
Come on mike, there's a few more than a few. Yes there are millions who struggle but that's life and always been the case and always will be. People go on about inequality but that'll always happen. Rich and poor has been with us for centuries and will do for centuries to come. It's life.
But our most valuable workers (arguably) Doctors and nurses are only get s 1% rise.
So fairness includes what? Someone who earns great money has to share his hard earnt money with some lazy toad who can't be bothered to get out of bed but want's the same living standereds as the hard worker who works till he drops while the lazy toad scratches his arse and might get out of bed if the sun is shining?
Social progress has also been made for centuries and the many people's lives have improved. Why are you so keen for this progress to stop?
What about the millions who work hard but are still poor?