- Thread starter
- #21
I used to regularly fly to Tenerife for £80 return train from London to Leicester £60
You can get Tenerife for £30 one way if not too fussy on dates. I suspect the collapse of Monarch will push prices up a fair bit
I used to regularly fly to Tenerife for £80 return train from London to Leicester £60
You cannot tell me, that no one has seen this coming?
Surely there would have been some sort of social media / media leak, rather than just the recent reports of a license extension.
Another shining example of capitalism at work
A friend and I were only discussing this yesterday lunchtime. I recently flew from Gatwick to Limassol for about £60. How sustainable was that?
Another shining example of capitalism at work
You can get Tenerife for £30 one way if not too fussy on dates. I suspect the collapse of Monarch will push prices up a fair bit
Another shining example of capitalism at work
My misses has worked for them for 18 years absolutley gutted for her she loved her job
I'm struggling to understand why, having been bailed out by private investment last year the same has happened again so 'suddenly' I'd have thought that investment would have come with a ton of conditions and scrutiny and yet the business has just gone pop. Even if they couldn't make the business work from a financial perspective they would have known it ages ago and could have jacked up prices, lost share and gone about it in a much more sensible and controlled way.
I don't see any suggestion that their demise is down to a creditor, it appears they couldn't get more funding but kept going until they completely ran out of cash
Not a problem she dashed off early to gatwick this morning to find out whsa happens next very sad times
Put my twatty post into perspective. Apologies. All the best for her and your future.
Another shining example of capitalism at work
i may be mixing with another troubled business (though they often share the same issue), the banks/investors do apply rules, covenants, to the loans they make to the business. i.e. maintaining certain cash flow or margins. aircraft are a high capital investment they are leased otherwise a loan taken out to buy, so maybe relating to those arrangements (news report noted the announcement occurred once all planes had returned to UK to ensure they where secured). nothing happened suddenly, this has been bubbling away for a year, they keep details out of the public domain as long as possible as otherwise people dont book with them and financial difficulty becomes a self fulfilling problem.
i may be mixing with another troubled business (though they often share the same issue), the banks/investors do apply rules, covenants, to the loans they make to the business. i.e. maintaining certain cash flow or margins. aircraft are a high capital investment they are leased otherwise a loan taken out to buy, so maybe relating to those arrangements (news report noted the announcement occurred once all planes had returned to UK to ensure they where secured). nothing happened suddenly, this has been bubbling away for a year, they keep details out of the public domain as long as possible as otherwise people dont book with them and financial difficulty becomes a self fulfilling problem.
If the worst happens, I hope your missus finds a job she'll love just as much.My misses has worked for them for 18 years absolutley gutted for her she loved her job
Air Italia which is being bailed out as going bust by their Government ?
Isn't their Government bust too
Another shining example of capitalism at work
If the worst happens, I hope your missus finds a job she'll love just as much.
I understand why but are all their planes in the UK? if so then this news should have broken last night when they would have had to cancel all their last flights out I'd have thought
I watched Grayling on the Beeb this morning and he was talking about it being a regulated industry ... I think that's tosh. If Monarch were burning cash at that rate and had no workable plan to reverse or secure funding then (no matter how tricky) surely the business could have been wound down in a more controlled way even though it might have had to telegraph it's intentions
Oh and here's a piece from their CEO less than 3 weeks ago in Travel Weekly
Dismissed suggestions the airline is in trouble again after group accounts for the year to October 2016 showed pre-tax losses of £291 million. He blamed this on a write-off of the costs of the carrier’s current lease arrangements.
Monarch is due to take delivery of the first of 45 Being 737 Max aircraft next March and will replace its entire existing fleet over three years.
Swaffield said: “We pulled all the costs into one set of accounts.”
He described it as “the last legacy of the old Monarch” and said: “Monarch’s business will be so much more profitable with the new aircraft. There is a £100-million benefit on the bottom line.”