ThePompousPaladin
New member
- Apr 7, 2013
- 1,025
Bloody immigrants, coming over here taking our gold medals...
Lasse Virren was the only other athlete in history to complete a double, double in long distance running, of any nationality, in the Olympics, Mo has also won NINE major gold medals, at all the major events.
Although I have a huge amount of time for Daley Thompson, and Sen Coe, I think both would agree, they can't hold a candle to Mo
There's no doubt East African descent helps with long distance running, but culturally he is British. He lives a British life (when training permits), his wife is middle England British, he feels British.
If you want to talk biology, maybe his race steered him into long distance running rather than swimming, I don't know. But it's not a reason to lessen his Britishness.
Mo can run long distance, but what else? Daley done the business across multi-disiplines, that makes for a greater athlete. if we are going to focus down on single disciplines have to then bring in the rowers and cyclists.
Out of interest Monkey how do you view Bradley Wiggins? British ?
Mo is as British as the rest of us and what a fantastic double double British gold medalist he is
No he's not technically correct because he is mixing the concept of ethnic origin with nationality and effectively saying that as far as he is concerned black people can't be properly British. There is no such thing as "British Biology". At a stretch I suppose that you could talk about Northern European ethnicity but to exclude people from being "properly British" because of their ethnicity is just straightforwardly racist.I think people are misconstruing Cheeky Monkey's comment. The point he makes about Farah not having British biology, technically he is correct. He has the physiology of an African runner.
No he's not technically correct because he is mixing the concept of ethnic origin with nationality and effectively saying that as far as he is concerned black people can't be properly British. There is no such thing as "British Biology". At a stretch I suppose that you could talk about Northern European ethnicity but to exclude people from being "properly British" because of their ethnicity is just straightforwardly racist.
Yep - should have referred to race rather than ethnicity...I get the gist of what you're saying, and agree with it, but you seem to be confusing race and ethnicity?
(Sorry, it's a bug bear of mine)
I've no problem with him being classed as British , but no , he really isn't as "British as the rest of us ".
I've no problem with him being classed as British , but no , he really isn't as "British as the rest of us ".
I've no problem with him being classed as British , but no , he really isn't as "British as the rest of us ".
Sombody born in Mogadishu, who didnt come to this country until he was 8 , is never going to be as 'british as the rest of us' no matter how much you might want that to be the case.Your definition of British is stuck in the last century though. He's as British as the rest of 'us'.
Yes, of course he is , silly me, that changes everythingMuch as it may pain you, he has British citizenship and a British passport. Those are the only criteria. He IS as British as you.
Sombody born in Mogadishu, who didnt come to this country until he was 8 , is never going to be as 'british as the rest of us' no matter how much you might want that to be the case.
The man clearly bleeds Somali in all those photographs.