Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,265
I don't get you with the dunce cap. His father was Jamaican and he IS odds-on to win at 8/11.
You have no way of knowing that for sure. It was a public vote - and you can't be inside everyone's head.
Bradley's comedy interview at the beginning of the show probably won him a huge number of extra votes.
Mo not winning doesn't make Britain racist. But his vote was lower than you'd expect, and there are reasons behind that.
I think that one of those reasons is possibly that he is black. I really doubt middle-England would have voted for him. Sad, but true.
Another reason is that he was born in Africa. Others would have got more local support - eg Murray (Scotland) and Ennis (big city of Sheffield).
Anyway...
I don't get you with the dunce cap. His father was Jamaican and he IS odds-on to win at 8/11.
I get you now. The cap was valid. Schoolboy error. I should have referred to the paint chart first...
Certainly looks that way :-(
I know (literally know) people in middle England that would not vote for Mo Farrah because of his skin colour/background.
I know (literally know) people who think Bradley Wiggins is a wanker. I know (literally know) people that think Jessica Ennis is a boring smug cow. I could go on...
I'd imagine that your friends know at least one wanker. Night.
I wasn't interested in push biking before, during or after the Olympics. Same for middle distance running. As such I'm a complete neutral who only observes that it seems strange that a track athlete such a Ovette, Coe, Cram or Mo could lose out to a er cyclist. But then I think some horse jumper won it last year. As such I wouldn't really worry about it as it seems a competition geared towards minority pass times instead of popular sports that people play. I think it appeals to the people that like to say "didnt they do well" no matter how few people play the sport.
But then I think some horse jumper won it last year.
It might be an idea to check who won it last year. Go on, have a look.
I'd not even thought of that myself. Didn't he do well?
Utter bollocks. Who are you to decide that cycling is a 'minority pass time' rather than one of the greatest sports on Earth? And by implication, that track running is somehow more credible?
Cycling has ALWAYS been huge in mainland Europe, and the fact that this country didn't participate or understand the sport fully until recently does NOT make the history of one of the World's most gruelling, challenging and beautiful sports any less valid.
We in the UK have now joined the party. More and more people are choosing cycling as their main participatory sport. Membership of cycling clubs has gone through the roof. At the highest level our cyclists are right up there amongst the best in the world, and more and more are coming through.
Bradley Wiggins has achieved incredible things this year, unprecedented and extraordinary, in a mass participation sport where it is unbelievably hard to get to the top. I'm delighted that more and more British people 'get' cycling. You clearly don't. So don't come out with any more of your patronising and self-congratulatory crap about it.
OK then, bollockbrain, explain how Kelly Holmes won if the UK is so racist? Miss counted votes?Well thanks for that.
I know where to do go for a healthy debate.
Err, haven't Giggs and Beckham both won it in the past? Football must be a minority "pass time".I wasn't interested in push biking before, during or after the Olympics. Same for middle distance running. As such I'm a complete neutral who only observes that it seems strange that a track athlete such a Ovette, Coe, Cram or Mo could lose out to a er cyclist. But then I think some horse jumper won it last year. As such I wouldn't really worry about it as it seems a competition geared towards minority pass times instead of popular sports that people play. I think it appeals to the people that like to say "didnt they do well" no matter how few people play the sport.
What a post!
This several times over.