Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
Thanks very much, should I go away then?
No fight your point. Don't let anyone stop you.
Thanks very much, should I go away then?
Martyn20, you seem to have conveniently side stepped this point?
Good
What a wet ****ing blanket you are
And that's your contribution!!!!
Thanks very much, should I go away then?
What if they'd been ripping up a bible? The worst they'd get then would be a littering ticket.
I'm trying to get my head around how anyone could support the actions of someone who takes a copy of the Qur'an, a book they clearly have no respect for, to a football match. Then sets about tearing out pages, passing then to fellow fans making clear which book they were from whilst chanting, "England".
The only possible motives for such actions is to either demonstrate their contempt for Islam or those who practice that religion.
Supporting such actions is akin to supporting the throwing of bananas - in itself an innocent action but with a clear motive behind it.
And that's your contribution!!!!
Yes, I do honestly think that it would not happen.
The fact that Martyn20 has failed to respond to this has nothing to do with the legal system.Whilst this is attempting to attack his point at the end of the day that is the fault of the legal system, whilst in my eyes the punishment of that case was not severe enough it does not mean that the Middlesborough fans' actions were any less of a crime or received an unjust punishment.
Let's for just one minute say you're correct in that assumption - does that make either tearing up the Qur'an or the Bible at a football match with the intent to offend OK? - I would say no.
I'm assuming that this action was done with the large population of Muslims in Birmingham as its underlying thought.
Whether people think the action itself is offensive or not, the motive is the issue at hand. I care little for Islamic doctrine but would be quite shocked if I saw someone tearing up the Koran, or the Bible for that matter, at a football match. What on earth was their intention ?
In a mature society, disagreement is healthy, but blatant provocation and deliberate acts that are intended to cause hurt or offence are not. We have grown up.
Mindless public actions like this cannot happen without the expectation of some sort of consequence.
As regards the old chestnut of being a 'Christian country', it is a subjugating phrase that has hijacked the true gospel meaning of Christianity for political purposes. Christianity is a faith, like Islam, it is certainly not a set of laws or a cultural way of life. This term comes from the, ever loosening, alliance of the church and the state. Decent standards and values exist within all faiths, if that is what people are referring to. But all too often this phrase has an undercurrent of latent cultural racism, effectively meaning 'White, anglo-saxon country'. That is why, despite being a Christian myself (through faith, not cultural understanding) I despise the notion that we are a 'Christian country'. Faith, the state, and inherent cultural understandings should always be separate things-unlike commonly held values.
The fact that Martyn20 has failed to respond to this has nothing to do with the legal system.
Do you think a Muslim should be banned/fined/taken to court for tearing up a few pages of the bible? What about if they tore up some vedic texts? The problem with having a religious hatred law is that each religion's view on what causes religious offence differs. Often, in the Muslim tradition, there is a distinct lack of open liberalism which has been the recent religious tradition of western Europe and to a degree America. This was always going to cause pain and conflict.My point was any religious hatred is wrong, especially when exercised at a football match. Someone else has turned it into an Islam v Christian debate.
I have no faith but I respect anyone else's right to practice theirs whatever that is. Others do not seem to think this freedom applies to Islam in the UK.
I guess that is a question that should be asked to the blokes who were arrested? There clearly is a division of culture, faith, race in certain areas. Pissed up blokes and someone passing them a book results in this kind of behaviour I guess.
I am going to an extreme, but.....I'm trying to get my head around how anyone could support the actions of someone who takes a copy of the Qur'an, a book they clearly have no respect for, to a football match. Then sets about tearing out pages, passing then to fellow fans making clear which book they were from whilst chanting, "England".
The only possible motives for such actions is to either demonstrate their contempt for Islam or those who practice that religion.
Supporting such actions is akin to supporting the throwing of bananas - in itself an innocent action but with a clear motive behind it.
Do you think a Muslim should be banned/fined/taken to court for tearing up a few pages of the bible? What about if they tore up some vedic texts? The problem with having a religious hatred law is that each religion's view on what causes religious offence differs. Often, in the Muslim tradition, there is a distinct lack of open liberalism which has been the recent religious tradition of western Europe and to a degree America. This was always going to cause pain and conflict.