Sussex Nomad
Well-known member
Presumably (I've only seen the title of the thread) he wasn't just questioning then.
Would you run him over if he was crossing the road... real ban material.
Presumably (I've only seen the title of the thread) he wasn't just questioning then.
Unreal, I know we have injuries but this looks mightily like this time last year when Gus decided we weren't good enough to go up and started ****ing around with the team. I really hope I am wrong but....
Player playing up
We knew that Kaz and Buckley were injured, so what the hell were you expecting. Vicente could have started instead of Crofts, but that's just one change. Crofts and Hammond to battle all game, then bring Vicente on later.All the way to Middlesborough to be greeted with news that it's Hammond, Crofts and Bridcutt starting. Not happy.
Unreal, I know we have injuries but this looks mightily like this time last year when Gus decided we weren't good enough to go up and started ****ing around with the team. I really hope I am wrong but....
Why? he's made it clear he doesn't want to tell the truth about which of our players are fit, as he doesn't want to give the opposition extra information. You know the score, we all knew Kaz and Buckley were out.I'm getting pretty annoyed with Poyet constantly telling the press all week that the players are fit and fine when they quite clearly aren't.
I'm getting pretty annoyed with Poyet constantly telling the press all week that the players are fit and fine when they quite clearly aren't.
According to Andy Naylor it is an unspecified injury but not a long term injury.
Would you run him over if he was crossing the road... real ban material.
maybe he does this to keep the opposition guessing
Don't all managers do that? Makes sense to me.
Would you run him over if he was crossing the road... real ban material.