LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Thanks for those linksThey've spoken out very strongly at what Israel are up to.
Israel seem to be ignoring them however.
Thanks for those linksThey've spoken out very strongly at what Israel are up to.
Israel seem to be ignoring them however.
Relevance?I see you have only jumped on in recent months?
I agree. However, large swathes of the rest of us are essentially aiding and abetting the one percent of nut jobs.
All the while most humans value material possessions and power over others so highly, we'll likely never be capable of peaceful coexistence.
You’re correct. No one on this thread has said they hate Israel, but I’d suggest many do detest Israeli foreign policy.I'm not sure I've seen a single person on NSC, either on this thread or anywhere else, post in a way to suggest they are a "hater of Israel".
I've certainly seen a lot of posts, and I include some of my own in this, question a state having seemingly little/no regard for the lives of millions of innocent people. You think it's acceptable to drop some leaflets and give over a million people a few hours notice to move. Many, including the WHO, disagree...
Evacuation orders to hospitals are a death sentence - WHOThe World Health Organization (WHO) says it strongly condemns Israel's orders for the evacuation of 22 hospitals treating more than 2,000 patients in northern Gaza.WHO said that the lives of those in intensive care or who rely on life support; newborns in incubators, and many others hang in the balance, in a statement."Forcing more than 2,000 patients to relocate to southern Gaza... could be tantamount to a death sentence," the statement says.The WHO says that health workers have overwhelmingly chosen to stay behind, rather than risk moving their critically ill patients, a choice it calls "impossible".It also warns that many civilians are seeking refuge around hospitals, saying that their lives, too, are at risk "when health facilities are bombed".The WHO ends its statement by calling for Israel "to immediately reverse evacuation orders to hospitals in northern Gaza," and calls for "the protection of health facilities, health workers, patients, and civilians".
A few people have suggested the same, and some seem to be quite sure, but there is no data I have available to me that backs that up yet.Fair enough - I was genuinely convinced as there’s a lot of similarities and the posts of both have been very challenging to deal with for me personally on a number of levels as they’ve both inflamed posters to make some pretty vitriolic comments about ‘Israel‘ the Country (as opposed to the people that have been running it and Netanyah’s Religous Zionists in particular…) which are a little triggering and difficult to read nothwithstanding very true and ok to say.
I don’t think for one minute any comments have been anti-semitic and thats not what I am saying - just to be clear!!
I’m just overly sensitive to it because ’Israel’ can also relate to people in Jewish history - ‘Israel’ = Jacob, ‘Israelites’ descendant of Jacob, all members of the 12 ‘tribes of Israel’ (of Jacob) etc and it is actually a beautiful Country with lovely people - just like most places in the world.
Apologies sincerely to @Steve Foster if I misjudged you
I'll ask again, since you may have missed the post where I asked you before.Shabbat Shalom
Israeli opinion is as widespread & diverse as the UK. Have you lived/spent time in Israel? Do you have family living in Israel?
At least in Israel all views are recognised/tolerated like here unlike the Palestinian’s lives.
They need rid of Hamas. Israel needs rid of Hamas.
USA will allow Israel to do the job.
You’re correct. No one on this thread has said they hate Israel, but I’d suggest many do detest Israeli foreign policy.
The thing that winds me up is that whenever anybody slags Israel off, they nearly always get accused of being an anti-Semite. This is just wrong, and it makes people reluctant to speak out publicly. For me, my criticism of Israel has nothing to do with religion, but everything to do with humanity.
Are they really? How so?The Israeli forces are on a completely different different ethical wavelength to Hamas & you know this.
In my observations, whilst SF comments are often, they are typically lightweight, normally Daily Mail deep in nature, if that helps!I'll ask again, since you may have missed the post where I asked you before.
What is your view on Netanyahu telling members of his own party that they need to support Hamas if they don't wish there to a be a two state solution?
Again, just in case you missed it the first time, here's the Haaretz article link for you:
A fascinating video looking at a discussion amongst Israelis and Palestinians about the conflict, focusing on different topics which have been referenced in this thread.
Highly recommended, despite being posted four years ago
Some hope. Needed this.
This is a tactic that I feel is frequently used by those defending the actions of the Israeli government. I actually wonder if it is an ‘unspoken policy’ endorsed by many members of the Jewish faith. This week figures were released by the CST (Community Service Trust, who in their own words ‘protect the Jewish community in the UK) showing a 464% increase in anti semetic incidents in the UK compared to the same week last year. To be honest I do not find this entirely surprising due to the events in Gaza in the last 7 days. But what I would ask is ‘when did the CST publish any figures showing a drop in such incidents?’. There seems to be a constant media campaign being conducted to minimise negative comment of Israeli/Jewish issues, and it seems the establishment falls for it.Thanks for posting this. I saw it earlier and it defies belief.
What also defies belief, or perhaps not, is @Steve Foster deliberate attempt to fuse opposition to the polices and actions of the Israeli government with anti-Semitic sentiment. This has been a clever political ploy for some time and what I would expect from some politicians within the party he represents.
As he says, SF offers only a total defence of Israel, often accompanied with accusations of anti semitism. He is totally blind to any wrong doing by Israel and dismisses any suggestion of wrong doing without thought.Purposely dismissing the counter-arguments focusing on the negatives of Israel does not form an engaging conversation - you have to acknowledge the reasonable points that many NSCers may have against your comments and therefore explain why you deem these false, usually with sources.
For example, if I were to say that Israel has been involved in bombing several innocent civilians evacuating from Northern Gaza today through their so-called "safe routes" - would you continue to strongly defend Israel? And that is only one of the many atrocities Israel has done.
EDIT: It almost seems that you are "supportive" of Israel, but may I must mention this is not a football match.
Well said, I think you have highlighted an important distinction between country and government.Thanks for posting this. I saw it earlier and it defies belief.
What also defies belief, or perhaps not, is @Steve Foster deliberate attempt to fuse opposition to the polices and actions of the Israeli government with anti-Semitic sentiment. This has been a clever political ploy for some time and what I would expect from some politicians within the party he represents.
What he doesn't realise, and clearly cares even less about, is how hurtful it is to label people as such through false allegations.
He states 'Unless you have lived, have direct connections, visited Israel - you will never know how unique, marvelous, beautiful & peaceful place it is - which it’s enemies hate with a passion'
I haven't visited Israel and am probably unlikely ever to now, which is sad as it was the one country I wanted to go to. But all that he says there is correct when referencing the testimonies of those who I know have been. This does not, however, countenance the truth about the actions of its rulers in Palestine.
I don't expect his mind to be changed. He is intransigent politically and intransigent on this issue. I'm just pleased to have read balanced opinions and learnt more on the historical issue from folk like @Zeberdi who is clearly aware that there are no 'Jew haters' here and if there were they would soon be removed.
It has certainly has by the far-right supporters of Netanyahu’s government and has been recognised as such - but it is not a tactic that is mutually exclusive to extreme Religious Zionists nor is even being Jewish a pre-requisite for such a tactic - In fact, the most vociferous (to our audiences ) defenders of the actions of the Israeli Government in relation to the Israel-Hamas War have frequently been Western (non-Jewish!) Governments with a political agenda in supporting Israel, swathes of mainstream media (and those influenced by it) or insidiously, those who would have an Islamophobic agenda in supporting Netanyahu’s treatment of the Palestinian people - - and remember too, in all times of War, where the citizens of any Country perceive themselves to be under attack, people of any ethnic group generally become more blindly ‘nationalistic’ and defensive during hostilities and in the immediate aftermath of a major atrocity being committed against them - (a fact failing political leaders are well aware of!) -This is a tactic that I feel is frequently used by those defending the actions of the Israeli government.
I refer you to my above comment - I do think we need to be careful with our generalising or when casting unfounded suspicion on groups of people where it’s not warranted or falling into the trap of homogeneity - homogeneity arises from unfamiliarity which can generate fear and suspicion, the very things that can actually give rise to anti-semitism (or Islamophobia or any other kind of discrimination ) When talking about the ‘weaponising’ of anti-semitism for ulterior motives I think we should be very specific when referring to whoever we think is doing it and be careful to avoid making sweeping statements or planting seeds of suspicion when it’s not warranted. While ‘anti-semitism’ should absolutely never be misappropriated or weaponised for political gain and should be called out when proven that it is - it should never be likewise misappropriated or weaponised by those who would have anti-semitic reasons for ‘cancelling‘ or downplaying anti-semitic behaviour when it does occurs. The implications of a belief in society that increasing levels of anti-semitism are largely down to ‘accusations of anti-semitism’ being used as tools for nefarious purposes is obvious.I actually wonder if it is an ‘unspoken policy’ endorsed by many members of the Jewish faith.…This week figures were released by the CST (Community Service Trust, who in their own words ‘protect the Jewish community in the UK) showing a 464% increase in anti semetic incidents in the UK compared to the same week last year.
All very fairly put and duly noted. As you are aware, I used the term ‘many’, not ‘all’.It has certainly has by the far-right supporters of Netanyahu’s government and has been recognised as such - but it is not a tactic that is mutually exclusive to extreme Religious Zionists nor is even being Jewish a pre-requisite for such a tactic - In fact, the most vociferous (to our audiences ) defenders of the actions of the Israeli Government in relation to the Israel-Hamas War have frequently been Western (non-Jewish!) Governments with a political agenda in supporting Israel, swathes of mainstream media (and those influenced by it) or insidiously, those who would have an Islamophobic agenda in supporting Netanyahu’s treatment of the Palestinian people - - and remember too, in all times of War, where the citizens of any Country perceive themselves to be under attack, people of any ethnic group generally become more blindly ‘nationalistic’ and defensive during hostilities and in the immediate aftermath of a major atrocity being committed against them - (a fact failing political leaders are well aware of!) -
I refer you to my above comment - I do think we need to be careful with our generalising or when casting unfounded suspicion on groups of people where it’s not warranted or falling into the trap of homogeneity - homogeneity arises from unfamiliarity which can generate fear and suspicion, the very things that can actually give rise to anti-semitism (or Islamophobia or any other kind of discrimination ) When talking about the ‘weaponising’ of anti-semitism for ulterior motives I think we should be very specific when referring to whoever we think is doing it and be careful to avoid making sweeping statements or planting seeds of suspicion when it’s not warranted. While ‘anti-semitism’ should absolutely never be misappropriated or weaponised for political gain and should be called out when proven that it is - it should never be likewise misappropriated or weaponised by those who would have anti-semitic reasons for ‘cancelling‘ or downplaying anti-semitic behaviour when it does occurs. The impact of a belief in society that increasing levels of anti-semitism are largely down to ‘accusations of anti-semitism’ being used as tools for nefarious purposes is obvious.
You never know.You are right, @Steve Foster does remind me of Live By The Sea and he has frequently appeared on this thread after the latter account's ban - could they be connected?
And SF has other accounts that post, albeit mainly, but not exclusively, on the score predictor thread.You never know.
After all, Paul Valley was posting unknown from HB&B's attic a few years ago. Lol.