And who do you have in mind as the next manager you'll try and drive out in 3 months time while he's still trying to get his team in place and playing the way he wants?
Spiros, I wouldn't bother. This berk would moan if we appointed Jose Mourinho.
And who do you have in mind as the next manager you'll try and drive out in 3 months time while he's still trying to get his team in place and playing the way he wants?
And who do you have in mind as the next manager you'll try and drive out in 3 months time while he's still trying to get his team in place and playing the way he wants?
Judging by the way it has gone previously probably Booker and White as caretakers while we look for another manager.
ARE there any 'anti MA campaigners' then?
There's people who will put forward their view that he is a poor manager, making poor decisions, and achieving poor results. That's very different from actually agitating against him.
Personally I dearly want Adams to succeed, as that means BRIGHTON will be doing well.
The tone of the people raising the critcism is such that it could be construed as trying to force the issue of either him being sacked, which some have advocated, or him walking away. Neither would be a good move for us as far as I can see and yes I do agree he has made mistakes but the only man who didnt still finished up on a cross, while we celebrate Easter.ARE there any 'anti MA campaigners' then?
There's people who will put forward their view that he is a poor manager, making poor decisions, and achieving poor results. That's very different from actually agitating against him.
Personally I dearly want Adams to succeed, as that means BRIGHTON will be doing well.
Your own views lack credibility.
You fail to acknowledge Wilkins successes or Adams current failings and any questioning of DK judgement is vehemently defended by you, irrespective of any opinion offered.
bhadeb is actually your 'alter ego'
Ahh! I was wondering when you'd show up!
Nemisis = bhadeb/deano seagulls. That's pretty good even for you! Anyway, carry on everybody, all good knockabout stuff!
PS - Westdene Seagull: great post.
ARE there any 'anti MA campaigners' then?
There's people who will put forward their view that he is a poor manager, making poor decisions, and achieving poor results. That's very different from actually agitating against him.
Personally I dearly want Adams to succeed, as that means BRIGHTON will be doing well.
Yes there are anti-MA campaigners, and you my friend, are one of them.
Why? Well, you have agitated against him, and in that very post you have highlighted this by calling him a poor manager. Yes, things are not going as well as they might at the moment, but a poor manager?? A manager with three promotions with different clubs does not represent a poor manager.
And yet you say you want him to succeed? How can you want a poor manager to succeed? That means he gets to stay longer, and you would prefer he leave now.
That's my view as well.
Obviously I want Adams to succed, as I want Albion to be in the play offs at least this year but I would also like him to:
(Just for starters)
Play players in their correct positions.
Stop signing journeymen players at the expence of our home-grown talent.
Pick players on form/ability rather than reputation or past performances.
Get the players to show a bit more guile and skill (passing to each other would be a start)
Pick the right team/formation
Get set pieces sorted out
Stop making crap and pointless substitutions
and why he bought back Booker and kept White is beyond me.
BTW I was one who doubted that bringing Adams back would be a good thing - I still hope to be proved wrong. I also feel that the way Wilkins was sacked/treated was handled badly, but that's not the point - Adams is in charge now, he has broken up last year's side and will live and die by his decisions.
I also realise that he has zero chance of being sacked as we simply cannot afford to pay him off.
ARE there any 'anti MA campaigners' then?
There's people who will put forward their view that he is a poor manager, making poor decisions, and achieving poor results. That's very different from actually agitating against him.
Personally I dearly want Adams to succeed, as that means BRIGHTON will be doing well.
If we stay in our current league position, when would you want him removed from his post. In other words Hans, how long would YOU give him ?
It makes little difference who manages the club if the people who control spending remain in power.
Well done you have pointed out that the current board has controlled the spending and not made the club bankrupt.
It makes little difference who manages the club if the people who control spending remain in power.
They've also spent more on the playing squad this season than they have for a long time have they not? And still we are not bankrupt. And we are going to build a new stadium. If someone came along with more money then the current board have made it clear they will accept investment, sadly that has not happened. I guess the antics of Archer 11 years ago have made sure we would not be able to find a sugar daddy as we have no asset, so for the time being, until the new ground is there, we have to doff our caps to the current board who have controlled spending admirably.
It makes little difference who manages the club if the people who control spending remain in power.
Sorry, but that's utter shit.
Not just in respect of the other answers above, but also in te way you meant.
Our playing budget is favourable compared with many many other teams in this league, and considering the FOUR championship players we attracted in the summer, and all the championship loanees, almost certainly higher than it was last year.
You can't blame this seasons insipid start on the board - it just won't wash.