Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Pretty good summary of the whole sorry episode. The efforts of a number of people to support these parasites are quite frankly embarrassing and politically motivated
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[News] Meghan v Kate
- Thread starter crodonilson
- Start date
Pretty good summary of the whole sorry episode. The efforts of a number of people to support these parasites are quite frankly embarrassing and politically motivated
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
He is not being criticized for his tie ups with Netflix etc. He is being criticized for his sense of entitlement that he somehow deserves more from his father and the taxpayer. If he simply went about his business with Netflix and did not seek to use his royal heritage as well there would have been no criticism. Can’t have it both ways.
Only I could do this, saw the poll and thought right I'll stick up for the Royals and voted Team Meghan, she's not the right one in that instance, is she?
https://www.insider.com/prince-harry-netflix-deal-the-crown-season-4-princess-diana-2020-11?amp
https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/amp34041354/prince-william-reaction-harry-meghan-netflix-deal/
https://www.thenews.com.pk/amp/7474...cry-the-royal-family-with-netflix-deal-report
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2020/11/netflix-the-crown-prince-harry/amp
https://www.express.co.uk/news/roya...Crown-Netflix-deal-series-four-royals-ont/amp
https://www.marieclaire.com/celebri...arkle-cant-comment-on-the-crown-netflix-deal/
https://www.businessinsider.in/thel...nces-in-the-past/amp_articleshow/77935368.cms
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...Harry-millions-Netflix-tells-lies-family.html
Not criticised, you say?
Is that enough for you?
There’s a lot more.
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
I am really puzzled. I didn’t say he hasn’t been criticized. Please read my post more carefully.
Your first 12 words are
“ He is not being criticised for his tie ups with Netflix , etc”
Is this some kind of new language you have invented that actually means the complete opposite of what you post?
If it is, I’m sorry to tell you , Boris Johnson has got there first.
“ He is not being criticised for his tie ups with Netflix , etc”
Is this some kind of new language you have invented that actually means the complete opposite of what you post?
If it is, I’m sorry to tell you , Boris Johnson has got there first.
SockMonster
Well-known member
You still haven't read his post properly have you?
sydney
tinky ****in winky
kate called megan nasty names ......don't be like kate.....ffs...
:
:
nicko31
Well-known member
Alan Jones, the Australian king of bigots...
https://www.monsterchildren.com/a-timeline-of-alan-jones-bigotry/
RossyG
Well-known member
- Dec 20, 2014
- 2,630
I don’t care what he is, it was a good editorial.
Yes I have, he says there is no criticism of Harry and Meghan hook up with Netflix, the criticism is all about their sense of entitlement and that they should be financially supported by his father.
My original post was that the whole Netflix deal had been criticised, I then posted 8 links to articles criticising the Netflix deal, (there are more) as proof that there had indeed been criticism of the deal.
I don’t understand how, enforcing the fact that there has been criticism can be construed as not having read or understood a post.
Gambling millionaire gadabout, dresses in Nazi uniform for fun, unsure of paternal lineage seeks beautiful but unsuccessful actress who enjoys public spats with Father and accusing in-laws of racism for trips abroad, wasting tax-payers money and TV appearances. Must love drama.
What could go wrong
P.S Take our millions and **** off if that's what you want to do, you deluded pair of over-indulged fannies. Stop popping back up to tell us how badly you have been treated.
What could go wrong
P.S Take our millions and **** off if that's what you want to do, you deluded pair of over-indulged fannies. Stop popping back up to tell us how badly you have been treated.
Last edited:
KeegansHairPiece
New member
- Jan 28, 2016
- 1,829
There is context for him hooking up with Netflix right? A show that has had a massive ratings success with The Crown worldwide with a very personal portrayal of his mother. There has to be some questions asked when you flounce off about media intrusion, how it impacted on your mother, how you don't want that to happen to your family.....then you sign up with Netflix!? I mean come on, I don't think that is criticism of him getting a job, that is criticism of some duplicity.
KeegansHairPiece
New member
- Jan 28, 2016
- 1,829
Gambling millionaire gadabout, dresses in Nazi uniform for fun, unsure of paternal lineage seeks beautiful but unsuccessful actress who enjoys public spats with Father and accusing in-laws of racism for trips abroad, wasting tax-payers money and TV appearances. Must love drama.
What could go wrong
One thing he can't be criticised for is keeping up family traditions at fancy dress parties!
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Well anyone can take the first 12 words of a quote, not read the rest of it and therefore completely change the meaning. It’s what tabloid journalists do....
To re iterate. He is not being criticized for his tie ups with Netflix etc. He really isn’t. He is being criticized for having those links whilst whining on about titles and being half in/half out of the royal family. His father ‘cut him off financially.’ WTF. So did mine but we didn’t fall out about it.
They reak of entitlement and wanting to have their cake and eat it. To spell it out to you that’s signing a deal with Netflix whilst still expecting titles and public money.It is hugely ironic that you are bumbling on about Boris Johnson in your other post whilst doing exactly what you accuse others of doing.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
She's now BANNED from the Amexkate called megan nasty names ......don't be like kate.....ffs...
Although I don’t think Harry has said anything about The Crown, apart from the fact that he had watched some of it, both his father and brother have made it clear through their media contacts that they take a dim view of it.
Nobody in the family comes out of it looking particularly good, and your guess is as good as mine about how much is gospel and how much is bollox.
My original point really was that such is the dislike of the couple for various reasons, some valid, some not so much,anything that they undertake to raise a few Bob, would have been criticised.
The Duke of Windsor attracted criticism for not taking any form of gainful employment after his abdication and relying on the Queen for his rather lavish expenses, Harry hasn’t gone down that route, he has got a very well paid deal with Netflix. He may have to hold his nose when he gets the cheque, but, at least he’s earning his own money.
Precisely. Earning his crust from the media he so utterly despises. Confusing isn't it?
Earn is stretching it but at least he can afford to put a "Ring" door bell on the front door, maybe even a solar security light or two. I would be prepared to put them up for them if needed my rates aren't too bad.
You have obviously not read one of the links I posted in my original answer to you, everyone criticising the Netflix deal, not criticising, in the main , his sense of entitlement and his belief that he should be bankrolled by his father.
I am a republican, my wish would be the Royal Family should be quietly shown the door when the Queen dies, with the country reclaiming the Castles, Estates, and other property that the Crown owns, but allow the Royals to keep the possessions they privately own.
If Harry’s flounce brings this nearer fruition, more power to his elbow, but, I don’t hate any of them, unlike some who have posted some really nasty stuff about the couple.