Dandyman
In London village.
London Irish said:Yes, I think the Carole move was a good one, he definitely created more than Harty, who is an honest trier but frankly Crewe had his measure by the second half. Do you acept Dandyman that if Carole had not been give his chance, there would have been a chrous of abuse for McGhee from the McGhee critics for not doing that while we were 1-0 down?
Re. adopting more attacking tactics while we were 1-0 up? Well, we stuck with the two-winger strategy for a long time in the game but it was obvious that was going nowhere because we couldn't get the ball off the Crewe midfield. If we had pushed another player forward, that would have played more quickly into Gradi's hands. The defensive move of sacrificing Frutos for Hammond was the right one, but alas making the right tactical move never guarentees success, that is up to the players on the pitch, and they were outplayed by Crewe.
The questions you ask are perfectly fair, if only all the McGhee critics were like you, we would have a good debate about the games on here rather than the usual abusive rubbish we get.
I regard Carole as probably our most talented attacking player, so if he was fit then I would usually want him to play. If he was not fit however then the question of the effectiveness of bringing him on is unavoidable.
As for attacking if the question returns to the players, does it not also return to what is going on in training and to what extent the palyers are being motivated and given leadership ? IMO it not so much everything being Magee's fault as whether or not he (and his assistants) have enought left in their lockers to improve things this season or next.