Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Richie Morris said:...and it can hardly lead to us doing any worse then we already are playing 442.
You mean that 5 wins in 36 games is not good?
Richie Morris said:...and it can hardly lead to us doing any worse then we already are playing 442.
Richie Morris said:I would suggest it is PATHETIC.
Richie Morris said:...and it can hardly lead to us doing any worse then we already are playing 442.
WELL DONE...........Yorkie said:I've done it.
I've found a post where Richie hasn't typed a word in CAPITALS.
London Irish said:OK, if you don't think they've been among the best features of our season, now I understand why you would sacrifice them. I don't think many would agree with you though.
Simster said:Steve, you have spent two pages on this thread trying to get everyone to admit that a change formation wouldn't have prevented a fluke goal and a defender giving away a free header. And you're right. Well done.
Simster said:We needed a formation that the players are comfortable with, and fairly consistent team selection. Sadly it's all too late now.
And as I say, all the manager can do is play a formation that limits the pressure on our defence, not account for specific situations. Obvious really.London Irish said:Actually I didn't apply it to the first Crewe goal, but you're dead right, it applies to that too
Originally posted by London Irish (page 12)
However, McGhee can't stop a fluke goal and one of his defenders giving an attacker a free header at a corner though, that's the bottom line.
So with goal difference (which is rather like points difference in rugby, btw) we are effectively 6 points behind with 10 games to go. Coincidentally, the same points tally as our last 10 games have yielded. So given those figures, you will apparently forgive me for "giving up".London Irish said:No it isn't - we're 5 points behind with 10 games left and we have a favourable fixture run-in, including against the team 5 pts away.
To be honest, I don't know because I haven't been to many games. I'll let the results do the talking. But how about you tell us what you think. Then given the fact you seem to know McGhee's every thought and defend it vigourously, that is one formation I think we should be able to discount on the grounds that nothing else that has been tried before has worked either.London Irish said:Rather than giving up, please explain what formation the players are most comfortable with and what consistent team selection would give us a chance. Cheers.
Eh?London Irish said:Sorry that the goal difference means so much to you? You wouldn't give up on the team if were only 5 rather than 6 points behind then?
With good reason. I haven't been to enough games. I also haven't been in the position to bring in players, kick out players, I don't know our transfer kitty etc. But I do know that defeat at Crewe was a predictably PONY result and yet again we've been turned over - from a promising position after Crewe gifted us a goal.London Irish said:Rather predictably, when challenged to present a positive case for what McGhee can do in this situation, you decline the opportunity.
He got banned for talking about football? Sounds a bit harsh.bhaexpress said:Didn't 1066 just get a weeks ban for this sort of conversation ?
blockhseagull said:That is a f***ing wank idea
Just get behind the f***ing team
555kaz said:So as were are in th relegation zone, we must demonstrate against the manager? In the two seasons he has been in charge, we've won at the Millenium Stadium, how many other league clubs have done that. We've styaed up against all odds, and we're not even down yet this year. I for one would like to take Mark McGhee out for a drink and thank him for all he has acheived for this club over the past 2 1/2 years. Poor bloke is on a hiding to nothing here, whatever he does, he will be slated by some sections. So I shall say thank you Mark Mcghee, if you leave, and we get Souness, then we will realise how lucky we were