Bugs Hill said:I think you will find that Skint will not renew their sponsorship unless McGee is replaced.
Rusthall Seagull said:The SHIT is you are ASSUMING you know what is going on at board level...you DONT! You are arguing a point that you have made up in your head....
...and calling people IDIOTS is pretty agressive in itself!
Albion Dan said:How anyone can call a boardroom disagreement a DISASTER, or how it means our club is (Anymore of) a laughing stock is very strange.
The story is that several people who put in alot of their hard earned cash, much more than the chairman himself, want to remove the manager who has taken us down. That is well within their rights in my opinion.
LI, it does sound like you are having a bit of a toys out of pram moment becasue your man McGhee has finally been chopped.
Bugs Hill said:I think you will find that Skint will not renew their sponsorship unless McGee is replaced.
Albion Dan said:
LI, it does sound like you are having a bit of a toys out of pram moment becasue your man McGhee has finally been chopped.
BensGrandad said:His name is well known to many and if he wanted the limelight of being named he would do so himself but he prefers to sit in the background and support the club so I will not name him and embarrass him.
London Irish said:What SHIT OR LIES have I made up you aggressive idiot?
IT IS TOTALLLY WRONG for a director of the Albion to get involved in the contracting work of the club - that is what I object to about Chapman.
IT IS AGAINST EVERY SINGLE MODERN BUSINESS PRINCIPLE of CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The CONFLICT OF INTEREST problems are HUGE.
We are having to go cap in hand to get PUBLIC MONEY to fund the Falmer stadium. They HATE this kind of conflict of interests and could have serious potential to disrupt our ability to attract grant money.
I haven't a clue if he is the guy behind getting rid of McGhee - you'll note he didn't have the guts to tell the Argus and level with the fans what he is up to at the moment!
But if Chapman is now going to become the real owner of the club - and that's what he'll be if he proceeds to humiliate Dick Knight by opposing him on a decision relating to the major strategic future of the club - the bottom line is he must completely withdraw from all commercial contracts that arise out of Falmer because I DON'T WANT OUR CLUB TO BE MADE A LAUGHING STOCK IN THE LIKES OF PRIVATE EYE, THE BUSINESS PRESS, OR BY ANY OF OUR ENEMIES, LEWES OR BAKER!
IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU, ROUGVIE.
Now explain to me how any of that is shit and lies!
s.stubbs said:Well,you talk such alot of old fanny flaps,it's really starting to get on my tits.
Les Biehn said:This thread is great, nobody has a clue what is going on, none of us. And if anybody did why would they reveal it on here.
Who would have predicted Rougvie getting agressive? Who would have predicted LI passing off speculation as fact and get aggressive while accusing others of being aggressive? Who would have predicted another ridiculous, 'I know something the rest of you don't know' post from Bens Grandad?
I love it.
Westdene Seagull said:If his name is so well known then there won't be a problem naming him for the few of us that don't know who the hell you're talking about then ?
Also, if he's not prepared to make his name public then I personally would rather he had nothing to do with the club.
Of course, it could be you're just making so called "facts" up !!!
Les Biehn said:This thread is great, nobody has a clue what is going on, none of us. And if anybody did why would they reveal it on here.
Who would have predicted Rougvie getting agressive? Who would have predicted LI passing off speculation as fact and get aggressive while accusing others of being aggressive? Who would have predicted another ridiculous, 'I know something the rest of you don't know' post from Bens Grandad?
I love it.
Wanderer said:Hey Westdene Seagull, just ignore BensGrandad, he is just a wind up merchant
Benny Zamora said:Errr...Martin Perry? McAlpines? It's not that unusual for directors to be involved in club 'contracting'.
London Irish said:Being a former employee is not a conflict of interest.