I wasn't aware that we could actually make players sign of us.
I thought they had freedom of choice.
I thought they had freedom of choice.
Oh come on, he works at the amex so he sees things, he saw CMS there the day before he signed and got this rep. Good for him, but now he's got sources at Millwall too?
Title should be changed to Mattock not to sign...epic fail backing up that no one on here knows sfa
would be disppointing as i thought he was quality. Assume he may not be on Gus wish list for some reason ?
Argus online this morning - Mattock joins Wednesday on a 3 year deal. Sitch, rather than present yourself as a guy in the know with sources, perhaps better to be a a bit more careful with your words otherwise you are going to have a lot more strops. It's always fun to see the rumours but, like I offended you before, you only seem to post what's in the public domain or something that doesn't happen. This thread is a good example. 14 pages of thread because people thought you were in the know and that Mattock would sign. A lot of people on here wanted Mattock to sign, hence are disappointed he hasn't and with you for presenting it as fact. Obviously 'another player in talks' is meaningless, so doesn't irritate. But if you are a bit more careful with your words, maybe you won't get so much flak.
As an aside, I also liked Mattock, but not sure an overlapping left back is best for a style when we have such good wingers on the left and we'd rather they were farthest forward than a defender. Perhaps a more solid left back, a stronger version of Painter, would be better for us anyway.
Worrying that Weds have signed him on a 3 year deal, a quality keeper in Kirkland & Oldhams player of the year all ready for pre season...we need to sharpen up fast
Will be very disappointed if Marcos Painter is starting the first game of 12/13
[MENTION=20109]Sitch[/MENTION] has a good track record for correctly breaking news of player transfers.
Same with Dicker.