[Albion] Match of the Day 16/12/17 official match thread

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Bob!

Coffee Buyer
Jul 5, 2003
11,631
yes.

But only on the rewind version
 














The Andy Naylor Fan Club

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2012
5,160
Right Here, Right Now
Thought Deeny's sending off was harsh. Yellow yes but not a red. Ho hum, had him down as one of their main threats for next week.
 




Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,761
at home
Thought Deeny's sending off was harsh. Yellow yes but not a red. Ho hum, had him down as one of their main threats for next week.


Really...scissor hack from behind? If that had been on Murray this place would have gone into meltdown.

Fantastic result formtown as they try and get back on track...great to see stoke ****ing it up though..mark Hughes is a nasty petulant little shit.
 




Mackenzie

Old Brightonian
Nov 7, 2003
34,009
East Wales
Really...scissor hack from behind? If that had been on Murray this place would have gone into meltdown.

Fantastic result formtown as they try and get back on track...great to see stoke ****ing it up though..mark Hughes is a nasty petulant little shit.
Hughes must be pretty close to the sack. Most of their fans hate him.
 






Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,289
Back in Sussex
I've lost track of retrospective action stuff. Are these right?

Tarkowski's can be looked at because the referee didn't give anything/missed it. If so it's hard to believe he can not be found guilty - it's blatant.

Murray's penalty could be looked at. Did he con the ref for the penalty? If so, unlikely to face any action - inconclusive.

Izquierdo's embarrassing dive can't be looked at as he didn't get anything out of it.
 


dangull

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2013
5,161
10 seconds of comments regarding the game and last game to view.

I DONT CARE WE ARE BHA AND WE ARE IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE
 








Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
20,573
Playing snooker
I've lost track of retrospective action stuff. Are these right?

Tarkowski's can be looked at because the referee didn't give anything/missed it. If so it's hard to believe he can not be found guilty - it's blatant.

Murray's penalty could be looked at. Did he con the ref for the penalty? If so, unlikely to face any action - inconclusive.

Izquierdo's embarrassing dive can't be looked at as he didn't get anything out of it.

Me too. I'm losing track with what will be looked at retrospectively and what won't etc.

Most of the 'talking points' on MoTD tonight were about players trying to con refs, opposing players and fans with dives, simulation and blatant cheating.

I'm falling out of love with professional football.
 






Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top