aftershavedave
Well-known member
That was reduced from a 5K majority previously. She benefited originally from getting rid of Norman Baker.
benefitted i believe from the refusal of the Greens to stand down?
That was reduced from a 5K majority previously. She benefited originally from getting rid of Norman Baker.
benefitted i believe from the refusal of the Greens to stand down?
benefitted i believe from the refusal of the Greens to stand down?
That was reduced from a 5K majority previously. She benefited originally from getting rid of Norman Baker.
By 1,000 votes when Labour and Green polled over 7,000 votes. What a rotten system we have.
Which is why I mentioned earlier that Starmer may be more inclined to look at an agreement with the LDs (and the Greens). A promise of guaranteed support for PR in return for LD/Greens standing down in certain seats may well be viable.
Which is why I mentioned earlier that Starmer may be more inclined to look at an agreement with the LDs (and the Greens). A promise of guaranteed support for PR in return for LD/Greens standing down in certain seats may well be viable.
I hope not. With PR, Farrage will finally be able to take a seat in Parliament (for whatever party he decides to invent a week after the next GE is announced). I'm sure Tommy Robinson and Jayda Fransen will also find some way of squeezing themselves in, too.
Which is why I mentioned earlier that Starmer may be more inclined to look at an agreement with the LDs (and the Greens). A promise of guaranteed support for PR in return for LD/Greens standing down in certain seats may well be viable.
BBC News - Nadine Dorries told to check 'validity' of social media posts
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52653609
I cannot stand Nadine Dorries.
She’s an expenses fiddler. Tried to get off on criticising Cameron and Osborne on a reality show and posts nasty right wing diatribes on twitter.
Absolute worst kind of politician and a caricature of the hypocrisy they represent.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Yes.Wasn't Norman Baker the MP who tried to so hard to prevent the Amex getting planning permission way back?
Perhaps they and their supporters should have a voice in Parliament.
What? As in "Would you like fries with that?" in the canteen?.
(as if they have a canteen in parliament ).
Calling [MENTION=34942]Dr. No[/MENTION]
and reciprocal arrangment not having Labour candidates elsewhere? unlikely, and this is why such arrangements never take off.
There may be one or two but that's not really the point. What LDs and Greens need is for PR; they're going to be doomed to a handful of seats until the end of time if we don't ditch FPTP. I'm sure they'd be quite happy to drop out of some seats that they're not going to win for a genuine chance of PR.
I have no idea how many Tory seats there are where the majority is below the LD vote but I bet there are a good many.
Swinson and Corbyn hated each other and were never going to reach an agreement but Starmer is not so dogmatic.
As for HWT's concern that Farage will get a seat in parliament ... maybe he will and maybe he should. I can't see the likes of Robinson getting anywhere near though, it's easy to have 5% cut-off point as the Germans do. And while I agree that a good part of the electorate are right-wing nutters, I can't see the Farage Party/Britain First/English Democrats/UKIP/EDL all getting 5%
They do have a canteen. A lady who worked there for years was suddenly caught up in the Windrush scandal when Theresa May was Home Office minister. She couldn’t provide two pieces of documentation for every decade she had been here since the late fifties when she arrived as a child.
Not only did she lose her job, but was also put into detention for a few months. She finally managed to prove she was here legally.