I'd agree with that, except the last bit - he is, IMHO, rightly in the same price bracket (at least) as Wan Bisaka, Mendy and Cancelo (although the latter's price was inflated by being part of a deal with an inflated price for a player going the other way in part exchange).Cucurella is a decent player. But for £70m I'd drive him there. That's just nuts.
£50m for his contract would be a good piece of business for the Albion. Sometimes we do rather deify our players.
City want a player who will drop into a side looking to win the Champions League. The next step up. He's not played at that level with any regularity. I can see why there is only so far they will go on a defender. I shouldn't imagine there are many defenders who have transferred at £50m plus (only seven at £60m plus). I'll get my tin hat, but he is not at that level.
FWIW, if we sell him to City this summer for less than £50M I will be disappointed - and I'm happy to put that on record in advance. No, I won't be saying that I know better than the club, or that Uncle Tony doesn't know what he's doing, just that I'd be a tad disappointed. Anything over £50M, I'd be sad not to have him around for another season, but would happily accept that is the nature of the game.
As we all know (well NSC does!) TB doesn't set a price tag for prospective buyers to meet (actually, I'll bet he does, just doesn't let on to anyone what it is!), but just rejects unacceptable bids. By the same token, Manchester City will have a figure in mind above which they'll just say f*** off, you're havin' a laugh. My guess is that those two figures are pretty close - but whether they'll actually meet in the middle? - an interesting and nerve-wracking few weeks await!
Last edited: