Dunno man. I think Cucu comes across as sane.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Marc Cucurella *Signed For Chelsea 05/08/2022*
- Thread starter Bring back Bryan wade!!
- Start date
Dunno man. I think Cucu comes across as sane.
Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 9,120
You are aware of how football message boards work? Most of the correspondence is complete and utter BS, particularly when it comes to transfers.
We can however look back on how the Albion do deals these days. Without doubt each player will have a price we are willing to accept, but that price will have to be met. We do not need to sell, Cucu has years left on his current deal and we can pay him more to keep him happy. Bloom does not like to get taken advantage of, and he is now in a position of relative if not absolute strength when it comes to these negotiations.
I think Cucurella would be a great signing for City, he'd bring a lot to that side, but if they try and take the piss with a low ball offer they will be rebuffed.
Also amongst all of this click-bait twitter hoo-ha City are yet to officially table a bid, so the idea that a deal is done is simply garbage at this moment.
Weststander
Well-known member
Leroy or Aladdin?
Clive Walker
Stand Or Fall
https://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/20...icial-talks-brighton-transfer-marc-cucurella/
So long Cucu. City bid and he's gone.
So long Cucu. City bid and he's gone.
beardy gull
Well-known member
Just repeating Romano that a bid is imminent. Which he’s been saying for weeks.
Clive Walker
Stand Or Fall
Think with Zinchenko leaving a bid really is imminent. City are wise enough not to low ball and the bid will be sufficient and off he goes, fairly simple really.
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Kinda depends on the bid, doesn't it... but yeah it would be a step in a bad direction.
Clive Walker
Stand Or Fall
If they bid he is gone, can't think of many other examples of City moving on other than Kane perhaps. They'll get their man!
severnside gull
Well-known member
So City aren’t prepared to sign Cucu unless we reduce the price by 40%
Very big of them I must say.
Negotiations over before they begin
Very big of them I must say.
Negotiations over before they begin
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Tony right now
FatSuperman
Well-known member
- Feb 25, 2016
- 2,921
Garry Nelson's Left Foot
Well-known member
That article tells us nothing. It quotes Romano's twitter post. Then says it 'understands' it'd take a bid in excess of 50m for Brighton to sell.
It adds nothing to the 'saga' so we're exactly where we've been for the past however many weeks. Namely, City may or may not want him. If they do they'll have to pay what we think is the right price.
Nothing has changed. Nothing will change until a bid has at least been made. This is an incredibly tedious situation at the moment.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Good to know they have met the price tag.
Mancgull
Well-known member
Quite right. Obviously they’ll make a bid at what they think is fair value to test Tony’s resolve. We’ve made sales of c£100m in the last 12 months so I doubt we need the money. Therefore Tony can hold out for his valuation of £50m plus. Who will buckle?
My guess is that Tony isn’t bluffing and City will fold and move onto someone else.
They state they won’t ‘overpay’.... so what, he’s our player with four years left on his contract. Therefore we dictate the price as we did with Ben White.
There are probably plenty of good Left Backs out there available for £30m or less, so City will hardly be bereft of choices.
Oh, and this is the same club who paid £100m for that floppy haired idiot who largely sits on their bench.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Bid WHAT though ?
Cucurella is under contract until 2026, which means City will have to come up with an almighty bid of £50m+ (with add-ons) just to get their foot in the door. I am very confident of TB paying hardball with this, and City will naturally have potential alternative targets who are not as pricy.
I'm not saying it won't happen, but this move is not as automatically inevitable as you seem to have convinced yourself it will be.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,262
By selling Zinchenko to Arsenal for £32 million City have weakened their negotiating position. Now they have cash and no left back cover.
Maybe they think that just because they are City the player will kick up a fuss and the club will be forced to accept a lower price, but I don't think that is going to happen with Cucu, who is such a model pro.
In addition, it is not in Brighton's interests to cave on the asking price, as you make a rod for your own back in future transfer dealings.
According to some sites, City were already up over £30 mill on their summer transfer deals even before Zinchenko, so even paying £50 mill would still leave them £10mill up and having only lost two regular starters (Sterling, Jesus) and gained three (Haaland, Phillips, Cucurella).
Maybe they think that just because they are City the player will kick up a fuss and the club will be forced to accept a lower price, but I don't think that is going to happen with Cucu, who is such a model pro.
In addition, it is not in Brighton's interests to cave on the asking price, as you make a rod for your own back in future transfer dealings.
According to some sites, City were already up over £30 mill on their summer transfer deals even before Zinchenko, so even paying £50 mill would still leave them £10mill up and having only lost two regular starters (Sterling, Jesus) and gained three (Haaland, Phillips, Cucurella).
dadams2k11
ID10T Error
What happens if the amount they bid is not the same as Bloom values Cucurella?
The rumour is we want £50m and City want to pay £30m.
Let's put it this way..... You own a house valued at £300k, I come along and knock on your door and say I want to buy it for £150k, will you sell it to me?