Mandatory thread 'type'?

[Smile]

Yes we do.

Ok, why do you think it should not be implemented?

 

[hans kraay fan club]

"Look at me" needs to be added to the list.

Haha. This.

(And the mods will be able to reclassify appropriate threads to that category, too )

 

[skipper734]

Other than 'Misc' you mean?

Good to see you're paying attention.

 

[8ace]

Haha. This.

(And the mods will be able to reclassify appropriate threads to that category, too )

I'd envisaged it being the only option available to certain posters - they probably wouldn't even notice such is their self-absorption.

 

[Bry Nylon]

Ok, why do you think it should not be implemented?

1. Page one gets cluttered up with loads of crappy little icons and ends up looking like my 5 year old's school exercise book
2. Threads change direction very often. What starts off as "Albion" can very quickly end up as something else. What happens then?
3. It it isn't broken, don't fix it.

 

[Hampster Gull]

Works for me. Don't forget an Islam thread

 

[Max Paper]

Too much, too soon...

 

[Bozza]

1. Page one gets cluttered up with loads of crappy little icons and ends up looking like my 5 year old's school exercise book
2. Threads change direction very often. What starts off as "Albion" can very quickly end up as something else. What happens then?
3. It it isn't broken, don't fix it.

1 - no. There'll be no need icons at all. The board will look exactly as it does right now.


2/3 - if you have no interest in using the filters then it doesn't matter if a thread changes direction as got won't even know what it was originally classified as.

 

[Kosmonaut]

I'd also like to be able to filter out certain thread types.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Yes, it would be good to have an 'all threads except Palace ones' option so we are able to avoid Palace Stand Chat when necessary.

 

[jakarta]

Shouldn't there be an ENREST category as they don't fit into any of the above, or indeed have much contact with reality?

 

[SIMMO SAYS]

Peoples Plumbing Problems should be there on its own merit & not come under the miscellaneous umbrella

 

[Eggmundo]

All sounds a little bit too complicated for my liking. If it aint broke and all that.

 

[Cheshire Cat]

NO.

You might as well split the board up into a miriad of sub-forums which willbe a nightmare to get around,and contribute nothing, while looking a complete mess. Leave the current anarchy alone - it works fine.

 

[symyjym]

No, because

a: There will be threads that could go under multiple categories.

b: There will be some threads that there is no correct category, unless you add more of them, which will complicate (a) further.

 

[Bozza]

NO.

You might as well split the board up into a miriad of sub-forums which willbe a nightmare to get around,and contribute nothing, while looking a complete mess. Leave the current anarchy alone - it works fine.

Why will it?

The board will look exactly the same to you.

If you choose to never filter threads, the board will still work in exactly the same to you too.

Whoever said it further up the thread was right: the "nos" just don't get it!

 

[Dick Head]

I couldn't give a flying **** one way or another.

 

[Cheshire Cat]

Why will it?

The board will look exactly the same to you.

If you choose to never filter threads, the board will still work in exactly the same to you too.

Whoever said it further up the thread was right: the "nos" just don't get it!

In which case there is no point in the whole thing.
.
I get it, but I don't want it.

If you decide against the sensible people, I demand a "Nazi Mod" type.

 

[Pantani]

Why will it?

The board will look exactly the same to you.

If you choose to never filter threads, the board will still work in exactly the same to you too.

Whoever said it further up the thread was right: the "nos" just don't get it!

Then why ask us? Seems like you have made your mind up, and it is your 'ball' after all.

 

[Guy Fawkes]

Why will it?

The board will look exactly the same to you.

If you choose to never filter threads, the board will still work in exactly the same to you too.

Whoever said it further up the thread was right: the "nos" just don't get it!

Then why have icons / filters when someone can just use the search or advanced search option if looking for something inparticular?

Seems unneccessary to me