Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Manchester United "What the F'kn hell is that"









Tim Over Whelmed

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 24, 2007
10,766
Arundel
Nothing says we want to compete on the pitch like spending £2,000,000,000 on a new stadium! Seriously guys, build a team and a £200,000,000 stadium.
 




Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
17,169
Is Ratcliffe still looking for funding from the public purse for this?
"United say the entire project has the potential to create 92,000 new jobs, will involve the construction of 17,000 homes and bring an additional 1.8 million visitors to the area annually. They add the project will be worth an additional £7.3bn per year to the UK economy."

"He said there was no date in place for when building work on the stadium would begin, adding: "It depends how quickly the Government gets going with the regeneration programme. I think they want to get going quite quickly."


Sounds like it, yes...
 






Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
17,169
Good call getting Sir Norm in. I’m impressed on a few levels.
To be fair, he makes a compelling argument and there are quite a few impressive elements to take in. But I'm not completely sold on the whole thing, if I'm honest. More like a pipe dream than the actual reality that Offshore Jim is clearly banking on.
 






Gabbiano

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2017
1,939
Spank the Manc
They saw how much money Spurs are making out of their new stadium and wanted a piece.

Manchester is less of a draw than London, but then United is a much stronger brand than Spurs.

Sad that this is the modern logic of football but hey, that's where we are.

I think it looks a bit odd, but at least it's interesting. Not just another scaled up bedpan.
 












Withdean South Stand

Well-known member
Mar 2, 2014
714
"United say the entire project has the potential to create 92,000 new jobs, will involve the construction of 17,000 homes and bring an additional 1.8 million visitors to the area annually. They add the project will be worth an additional £7.3bn per year to the UK economy."

"He said there was no date in place for when building work on the stadium would begin, adding: "It depends how quickly the Government gets going with the regeneration programme. I think they want to get going quite quickly."


Sounds like it, yes...
Well, in the interview with Neville, Sir Jim said the club wouldn't need public money to build the stadium but that they would need it to be the center-piece of the regeneration effort that was already previously announced by the Government. I read that more as the club will benefit from the improved transport links and road infrastructure around the ground without having those costs but that the Government won't actually be paying for the stadium itself. Technicality maybe, and it made me think about the amount of work the Albion had to do on the A27. I seem to recall we had to pay for the redesign of the road and the new bridge and expansion work that was mandatorily required.
 








Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
64,157
The Fatherland
To be fair, he makes a compelling argument and there are quite a few impressive elements to take in. But I'm not completely sold on the whole thing, if I'm honest. More like a pipe dream than the actual reality that Offshore Jim is clearly banking on.
I agree, whether Offshore pulls this off is another matter to the actual architectural plans.
 


JBizzle

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2010
6,592
Seaford
It's a really interesting concept design. I suspect the finished article may look a little different though. That said, given Man United's financial issues, this may well have "Crystal Palace's new main stand" all over it
 






dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
57,319
Burgess Hill
Well, in the interview with Neville, Sir Jim said the club wouldn't need public money to build the stadium but that they would need it to be the center-piece of the regeneration effort that was already previously announced by the Government. I read that more as the club will benefit from the improved transport links and road infrastructure around the ground without having those costs but that the Government won't actually be paying for the stadium itself. Technicality maybe, and it made me think about the amount of work the Albion had to do on the A27. I seem to recall we had to pay for the redesign of the road and the new bridge and expansion work that was mandatorily required.
‘Part of regeneration project’ = ‘access to cheap funding’
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here