I thought JPVH looked pretty average in the first 15 or 20 mins, misplaced passes and not as assured as usual under pressure. He certainly grew into the game and was immense by the end thoughHinshelwood was superb but Van Hecke even better today. What a performance.
Well..... one thing that he did in extra time,, which was kindve key to winning the game.....Can someone who voted for DW explain why?
This. Hinsh edges it for me. 120 mins of pretty-much error-free midfield play against strong oppositionI thought JPVH looked pretty average in the first 15 or 20 mins, misplaced passes and not as assured as usual under pressure. He certainly grew into the game and was immense by the end though
While I went for Hinsh, Webster has a case too. I thought Bart was excellent tooNo need for the whole list of names. It’s Van Hecke or Hinshelwood, any other answer is wrong
It’s not right but as good as a defence is, and a great midfield, goals win matches.McCoist on itv gave it to Welbeck. He was a striker I suppose.
Argus reporter..?Can someone who voted for DW explain why?
Welbeck played 40 minutes out of 120.It’s not right but as good as a defence is, and a great midfield, goals win matches.![]()