sounds like good old fashion scaremongering. why wouldnt water and related chemicals be priority, protected industry like elsewhere?
For the same reason NHS workers weren’t protected?
sounds like good old fashion scaremongering. why wouldnt water and related chemicals be priority, protected industry like elsewhere?
Given UK's death toll I think we'll be seeing a fair bit of herd immunity also. In a funny way, countries like Germany who have quashed the initial wave far better might struggle to fully open up as easily. Initial tests in Bergamo suggesting as many as 60% may have been infected.
For the same reason NHS workers weren’t protected?
Maybe. I'm a bit sceptic about the Bergamo numbers.
PPE you mean? The problem there was that China was the country making them.
Anyone know where the chemicals come from?
For the same reason NHS workers weren’t protected?
Tests on people in Iceland resulted in similar figures, though.
its pretty well studied by now, and determined that coronavirus is spread by droplets, either in air momenatily or settled on surfaces. it is not airborne, floating around in the air for extended time.
Always someone else to blame eh? If you outsource your work, you are still accountable and responsible.
Maybe. I'm a bit sceptic about the Bergamo numbers.
I’m not interested in blame or point scoring, just facts.
Outsourcing left us vulnerable, but it meant we got stuff a lot cheaper. Make it here and it cost 3-5 times more.
I’d rather we made it here, but even then we could never be totally self sufficient as we can’t grow rubber trees for Latex gloves.
Here are more facts:
The virus disrupted manufacturing in China and also created a domestic demand for the products.
An increase in demand globally led to more shortages. We had a contract with France which they just refused to honour.
China sent us PPE that turned out to be defective and unfit for use.
I’m no expert here, but surely simple risk/mitigation analysis would read something like:
Risk: PPE made overseas. Risk to supplies.
Mitigation: Maintain a reserve.
After all, wasn’t this what that pandemic planning thingy three or so years ago was supposed to be for?
There was a reserve, although I understand that was more due to Brexit.
It's been mentioned that masks have a limited lifetime, so you can't stock millions and millions of them just in case a pandemic comes along.Mitigation: Maintain an adequate reserve.
It's been mentioned that masks have a limited lifetime, so you can't stock millions and millions of them just in case a pandemic comes along.
Sent from my WAS-LX1A using Tapatalk
As you say, it’s not an airborne disease due to the actual size of the virus. It comes out in your breath and does not ‘float’ but rather descends to the ground. You are clearly going to avoid infection if you are more than 6ft from an infected person (and don’t touch what they’ve touched and touch your face etc). However, add a breeze and perhaps an infected person cycling past you on a bike and the 6ft distance rule could be compromised; I think this was what the poster may have been getting at.
Droplet transmission occurs when a person is in in close contact (within 1 m) with someone who has respiratory symptoms (e.g., coughing or sneezing) and is therefore at risk of having his/her mucosae (mouth and nose) or conjunctiva (eyes) exposed to potentially infective respiratory droplets. Transmission may also occur through fomites in the immediate environment around the infected person.8 Therefore, transmission of the COVID-19 virus can occur by direct contact with infected people and indirect contact with surfaces in the immediate environment or with objects used on the infected person (e.g., stethoscope or thermometer).
Airborne transmission is different from droplet transmission as it refers to the presence of microbes within droplet nuclei, which are generally considered to be particles <5μm in diameter, can remain in the air for long periods of time and be transmitted to others over distances greater than 1 m.
More on the water/food thing (its google translated so dont get all messy with me Harry) from The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB):
"Agriculture, energy supply and electronic communications can be challenged, among other things, by lack of personnel, lack of spare parts and disruptions in logistics," says Maria Bergstrand, unit manager for operational management.
"There is a risk of a shortage of chemicals in the drinking water supply which can have consequences for our drinking water supply in the long term," says Maria Bergstrand.
There is also a risk of delays in flocculant deliveries used for water purification, according to Bergstrand.
When asked about when these shortages could occur, Bergstrand said "it could affect water and certain food types within 1-2 months unless the situation change".
Nice. Well, lets hope for the best. And lets hope the immunity lasts a while or its just... depressing.
How very FrenchWe had a contract with France which they just refused to honour.
Putting water on a rolling boil for a minute will purify it for drinking. You've just got to be a bit more organised about when you want to drink it surely? Which, in a lockdown, really isn't a problem.
Also not sure if she's talking about Sweden specifically or the world? The logistical challenges must surely vary from country to country. And she says SOME foodstuffs.
Re: mass testing, "At this point in time, most people who appear to have Covid-19 do have it, but that wouldn't be true during flu season, for example," he says.