D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
Yep. Our neighbour had a friend visit yesterday and today. Albeit in the garden, but they were not even keeping their distance.
It's these people that will make it worse for everyone else.
Yep. Our neighbour had a friend visit yesterday and today. Albeit in the garden, but they were not even keeping their distance.
I kinda hope we do go into a higher level of lockdown - just for 7-10 days, really strangle the growth of this virus.
Gosh, you are grouchy today. He may not try to peddle it as it would be useful, and he only peddles bollocks - got it?
Actually, if we are going to be serious tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), are sold as supplements for people without gallbaldders or who dont produce enough bile; they help to digest fats. I don't think they are sourced from bears here in the west though, like the Chinese do.
I guess there were too many assumptions in my light-hearted post.
Spain and Italy with fewer new deaths than the UK
Spain and Italy with fewer new deaths than the UK
Yeah, worse for people like this in a friend's Facebook status. He is a paramedic from London.
View attachment 121806
Yeah, worse for people like this in a friend's Facebook status. He is a paramedic from London.
View attachment 121806
Boris Johnson has had to go to hospital for some tests. Hope he’s ok.
I don't see it that way. There isn't a peak that's set in stone, that you want to get to quickly. The peaks in Italy and Spain have been reached because the countries are locked down, stopping the virus from spreading. If all restrictions are removed, the virus will spread again and they'll have another peak. Sweden, meanwhile, will keep heading towards their peak, unless people are social distancing enough through choice.The BBC has chose to show the Spain data as a separate graph as in 2 days the Spanish drop has been dramatic, but the Italy data are more persuasive as the drops have been making a pattern over a longer period. I want to see a few more days (7 will do) of sustained pattern then I'll be persuaded, and my persuasion will be that as [MENTION=38333]Swansman[/MENTION] has noted, allowing (deliberately or via gormlessness) some people to die by allowing some spread may allow the peak to be reached more quickly
You've got no hope of people staying home when leaders like Catherine Calderwood can't be ****ing bothered to follow her own advice.Yeah, worse for people like this in a friend's Facebook status. He is a paramedic from London.
View attachment 121806
You've got no hope of people staying home when leaders like Catherine Calderwood can't be ****ing bothered to follow her own advice.
At least she's had to resign, but I doubt she's the only one in such a position who thinks the rules are only for us plebs.I know. I despair.
I don't see it that way. There isn't a peak that's set in stone, that you want to get to quickly. The peaks in Italy and Spain have been reached because the countries are locked down, stopping the virus from spreading. If all restrictions are removed, the virus will spread again and they'll have another peak. Sweden, meanwhile, will keep heading towards their peak, unless people are social distancing enough through choice.
Of course if a large percentage of the populations have had the virus and are now immune, things will be different, but we've not yet had any evidence that's happened.
So without quick vaccine generation, it will be 'see you all in lockdown, again, next year'.
I wasn't suggesting this would be any different, I'm just concerned there's still a large percentage of us who haven't had it, so the only way to avoid another peak would be to keep social distancing measures going for a long time yet.Can't think of any viral infection where, after you've had it you're not immune, though.
I wasn't suggesting this would be any different, I'm just concerned there's still a large percentage of us who haven't had it, so the only way to avoid another peak would be to keep social distancing measures going for a long time yet.