Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Maheta Molango released
- Thread starter AZ Gull
- Start date
The Large One said:
His "career"....
http://www.seagulls.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/ProfilesDetail/0,,10433~30457,00.html
The Large One
Who's Next?
Well, the club took a punt on him, didn't like what they saw, and shipped him out.
Simple, really.
Simple, really.
The Large One said:
Yeah that was el turi!
If he was crap enough to only have been given 4 games in a whole season (and they were spaced out after starting in the first two). WHAT THE HELL WAS HE SIGNED FORTonyW said:
?Surely any scout/coach/manager willing to take a 3 year risk on a player must have seen enough previous form to warrant giving him more starts and a chance to get a run of form going.
Absolutely piss-poor management (again!!) and a total waste of money we don't have.
TonyW said:If he was crap enough to only have been given 4 games in a whole season (and they were spaced out after starting in the first two). WHAT THE HELL WAS HE SIGNED FOR
Surely any scout/coach/manager willing to take a 3 year risk on a player must have seen enough previous form to warrant giving him more starts and a chance to get a run of form going.
Absolutely piss-poor management (again!!) and a total waste of money we don't have.
Quite, even if he was on a small amount its all money.
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
That is true. Doesn't mean he was any good. He was by all accounts DIRE at Wrexham and Lincoln, my mate who supports Oldham reckons he was one of the worst players he's seen (and he's seen a fewTonyW said:If he was crap enough to only have been given 4 games in a whole season (and they were spaced out after starting in the first two). WHAT THE HELL WAS HE SIGNED FOR
Surely any scout/coach/manager willing to take a 3 year risk on a player must have seen enough previous form to warrant giving him more starts and a chance to get a run of form going.
Absolutely piss-poor management (again!!) and a total waste of money we don't have.
). Plus he was crap for the reserves whenever I saw him.
British Bulldog
The great escape
- Feb 6, 2006
- 10,974
TonyW said:If he was crap enough to only have been given 4 games in a whole season (and they were spaced out after starting in the first two). WHAT THE HELL WAS HE SIGNED FOR
Surely any scout/coach/manager willing to take a 3 year risk on a player must have seen enough previous form to warrant giving him more starts and a chance to get a run of form going.
Absolutely piss-poor management (again!!) and a total waste of money we don't have.
Did'nt we reject him after his first trial here?
¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤
Banned
The nightclubs of Brighton won't be the same without his presence 
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
British Bulldog said:
No.
We signed him after his first trial.
We had the Hungarian lad (Kerekes?) back for a second trial, rejected him. He then got himself a club in Hungary and 6 months later was playing for the Hungarian National Side.
¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤
Banned
Uncle Buck said:
British Bulldog
The great escape
- Feb 6, 2006
- 10,974
Uncle Buck said:
I stand corrected. Age is starting to play tricks with my mind.
Yoda
English & European
Uncle Buck said:
And played for them against ManUre at Old Trafford in the Chumps League. They even mentioned his trial with us.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Yoda said:And played for them against ManUre at Old Trafford in the Chumps League. They even mentioned his trial with us.
Who was our manager at the time....
Yoda
English & European
Uncle Buck said:
Magoo.
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Kerekes did look woeful in fairness.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Silent Bob said:
He managed to essentially run into the post at Southend whilst trying to head the ball in from 2 yards...
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Les Biehn said:
Well better than any of our front me can achieve...