Philzo-93
Well-known member
Ask her parents.
This.
Ask her parents.
Criminal neglect? I've known people who would put their children to bed in their own house and be further away that where they were in relation to Maddie, whilst being in the same building.
Good parents never make mistakes. Bad parents do. Or something...
Nope there isn't. If people are brutally honest, if they haven't found her by now they aren't going too.
[yt]Ly8AMyCpfjg[/YT]
Criminal neglect? I've known people who would put their children to bed in their own house and be further away that where they were in relation to Maddie, whilst being in the same building.
Good parents never make mistakes. Bad parents do. Or something...
Exactly, point well made. There is no difference to what the McCanns did and being on holiday in a hotel, putting your kids to bed and then going down to the hotel restaurant to eat. In fact, you would probably be further away from your kids than they were.
The first time they were asked about being suspect's is the first time she didn't look at Kirsty Wark when answering. NOT ONCE!
The reference to Gerry being at the Tapas Restaurant at the time was never proven. Funnily enough the photofit on Crimewatch looks remarkably like a well known parent. Mythis is what the police are hoping to prove.be
This is not aimed at anyone or indeed any comments so far.
Debate by all means but please do not start name calling etc etc just because opinions differ.
Stay calm guys
I love how people won't allow anyone to have different opinions, what I think is based on maybe a hunch yes as nobody seems to know anything but how anyone can say they aren't shifty is beyond me,
The first time they were asked about being suspect's is the first time she didn't look at Kirsty Wark when answering. NOT ONCE!
I love how people won't allow anyone to have different opinions, what I think is based on maybe a hunch yes as nobody seems to know anything but how anyone can say they aren't shifty is beyond me, people have pulled the wool over people's eyes before so why not them? A few questions they refused to answer....
43. In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?