B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
I was just wondering. I'm not sure it's anti-CMS as we'd love to see him score 20!
It's more just questioning but I dunno
Fair enough... CMS doubters then!?
I was just wondering. I'm not sure it's anti-CMS as we'd love to see him score 20!
It's more just questioning but I dunno
The Peterborough videos show Macca as a much more accomplished and confident player, even shooting with his left foot and scoring on one occasion. So not only can he improve, but it looks like he has played better in the past.
I was just wondering. I'm not sure it's anti-CMS as we'd love to see him score 20!
It's more just questioning but I dunno
He scored every week for Peterborough in League 1 but not in the Championship, which is why they got relegated.
CMS might benefit hugely from Vicente being fully fit from the off. Vicente is the player who is most likely to thread through the sort of passes that CMS will flourish from. Here's hoping, anyway.
Yes he did. It doesn't alter the point though does it.
It's exactly the point. Players can score a hatload in League 1 ie Glen Murray, CMS etc but not in the Championship. Barnes has done better and is still learning. CMS has wasted many a one on one situation - the first at Leicester which was a howler, and yet still fans excuse him by saying that he isn't scoring because of lack of service. He is a good striker but not consistent enough to be our main striker at this level.
It's exactly the point. Players can score a hatload in League 1 ie Glen Murray, CMS etc but not in the Championship. Barnes has done better and is still learning. CMS has wasted many a one on one situation - the first at Leicester which was a howler, and yet still fans excuse him by saying that he isn't scoring because of lack of service. He is a good striker but not consistent enough to be our main striker at this level.
Fair enough... CMS doubters then!?
I do honestly think we need a box to box Target man who can play alongside CMS. Somebody we can use plan B with, because times last season we were losing the ball far to often in the air, against big tall defenders and we tried it with Vokes and Barndoor but neither of them were the type of player, who I thought were good enough to go alongside CMS. I know this might sound like a ridicolous statement to make, but I think Heskey or even Becchio would be the answer to our Striker problems.
I agree, but also at Leicester Harley missed a double chance from a similar position and Barnes also did not take a good opportunity.
Flawed.
5 man (including 3 centre) midfields is the way forward. All the progressive managers and teams playing that way, including Gus .
To win the midfield battle.
Barnes shows flexibility and can assist in midfield. CMS doesn't have that in his locker.
Flawed.
5 man (including 3 centre) midfields is the way forward. All the progressive managers and teams playing that way, including Gus .
To win the midfield battle.
Barnes shows flexibility and can assist in midfield. CMS doesn't have that in his locker.
The money's already been spent, forget it, it's time to get the best out of all your players.But when you spend the amount of money we spent on CMS, you do expect a better return than from Barnes (£50k) and Harley (£300k?)
The money's already been spent, forget it, it's time to get the best out of all your players.
But when you spend the amount of money we spent on CMS, you do expect a better return than from Barnes (£50k) and Harley (£300k?)
You really are overly-aggressive, aren't you!? As well as regularly spouting opinionated BS.. how will it look to Tony B, Gus boss' then?
Oh, and...
The Commander's stated assumption that we can just pluck a free-scoring striker out of thin air is amongst the biggest load of sh1t I've EVER read on here... we are struggling to bring in 1 striker, let alone 2! Please, please can the CMS-haters just get real...