hughfromalice
Member
- Sep 8, 2022
- 44
Credit where its due I thought Luton were excellent.
Lots of teams have tried to press us and got massacred but they worked their socks off, worked as a unit and more importantly did something useful and purposeful with the ball. Reminded me a lot of the Everton game last season.
We did look miles off it and we do have these games every now and then. I wonder if it's mind as well as body. The way we play takes immense concentration and if we have 50% + of players not concentrating/ completely on it we tend to collapse. Almost always precipitated by an early goal which we never look remotely like recovering from.
I agree with you that Luton were excellent. Tactics spot on. Unrelenting 'do or die' commitment and no let up for the whole 90.
They pushed physicality to the limit, but were disciplined enough to just about always stay with the legal limit.
They made us look busy, dainty and ineffective. Tickatack passing to little effect. In mid-field, a swarm of Luton shirts around the ball and yet we seldom passed accurately to where the gaps were. On the other hand, when they won the ball they were often effective with fast break throughs that left us exposed.
Every tactical system trades advantages against weaknesses. It always has to keep evolving as other sides develop counter measures. It's about a learning journey, sometimes painful. What have we learned from last night and how will we apply it to adapt better to the factors that resulted in us losing? How will we improve our advantage/ weakness effectiveness?
Personally, I love De Zerbi's style, high risk as it can be. The proof of its effectiveness is best measured over seasons, where the extremes get put into their proper statistical perspective. Even so, on an emotional level, it felt like a punch in the guts last night!!!
Last edited: