Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Lucy Letby









Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,860
The Fatherland
Whilst of course you’re completely right I note your account is comparatively new, I don’t think you’d have been particularly impressed with NSC pre 2010 😉
That ancient Sugarbabes thread which was recently bounced is a good example. The state of some of those comments :lolol:
 










1066familyman

Radio User
Jan 15, 2008
15,367
FFS!

Can't the adults in the ton just so feeding the troll
What's this got to do with anything?

You're clearly in the camp of thinking having sex with a woman found guilty of killing babies is 'funny'.

You and your chums can carry on ... I'm out of here and putting this thread on ignore.
Why not just put the idiots on ignore instead, rather than have trolls kick you off a thread.

They've already succeeded in de-railing the thread because they've got a response.
 








PascalGroß Tips

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2024
866
FFS!

Can't the adults in the ton just so feeding the troll

Why not just put the idiots on ignore instead, rather than have trolls kick you off a thread.

They've already succeeded in de-railing the thread because they've got a response.
In actual fact, after posting my last message I decided what you suggested was the way to go. So a few have gone on ignore and I'm still here. And yes, I should have done that a few posts ago (y)
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
27,256
Why are you now clapping and putting smiling emojis on people’s posts?

You mis-read the room. Get over it.
Maybe I was right about the ban on folk using excessive smileys...
 




Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,742
Hove
Not Guilty.

If you get the FULL shift chart, you can manipulate the deaths and pin it on any one of the nurse.



Edit: They even used Dr Shoo Lee paper from 1989 as evidence at the trial of skin discoloration as a sign of injecting air into the stomach. He as since updated the paper from 1989, in December last year. He wasnt even asked to be a witness as the writer of the paper at the trial.

Now Dr Shoo Lee as got an independent team of world leading neonatal experts together and done their own research and concluded the babies were not murdered.

They decided it was plausible they died by natural causes or through poor medical care. That isn’t the same as concluding they weren’t murdered.
 








Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,742
Hove
He literally says in the press conference, he concludes they were no murders.


He states ‘we did not find any murders’ that is not the same as concluding they weren’t murdered. He specifically stated ‘the medical evidence doesn’t support murder in any of these babies’ - again this isn’t a conclusion they weren’t murdered, this is a conclusion the medical evidence in their opinion doesn’t support the case for murder.
 




dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,805
He states ‘we did not find any murders’ that is not the same as concluding they weren’t murdered. He specifically stated ‘the medical evidence doesn’t support murder in any of these babies’ - again this isn’t a conclusion they weren’t murdered, this is a conclusion the medical evidence in their opinion doesn’t support the case for murder.
If there is no medical evidence that the babies were murdered, then is it really possible to convict anyone of their murder? You would need some very robust statisitical evidence, for example, and that certainly wasn't there.
 


Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,742
Hove
If there is no medical evidence that the babies were murdered, then is it really possible to convict anyone of their murder? You would need some very robust statisitical evidence, for example, and that certainly wasn't there.
Doesn't this happen with asphixiation cases such as murders in care homes? There may not be any definitive medical evidence a victim was murdered, but convictions are made based on all the evidence.
 




1066familyman

Radio User
Jan 15, 2008
15,367
I'm still struggling to understand why her original defence team didn't find, and call upon, it's own medical and statistics experts to call upon, rather than just rely on questioning the prosecutions experts.

I know there was discussion on here about how the prosecution can often withhold valuable evidence, but it does seem that her original defence team wasn't quite doing it's job properly.

Or am I missing something?
 


The Optimist

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 6, 2008
3,025
Lewisham
I'm still struggling to understand why her original defence team didn't find, and call upon, it's own medical and statistics experts to call upon, rather than just rely on questioning the prosecutions experts.

I know there was discussion on here about how the prosecution can often withhold valuable evidence, but it does seem that her original defence team wasn't quite doing it's job properly.

Or am I missing something?
They actually did have an expert witness but didn’t call him. I don’t get it either.

Edit: Letby does now have a new barrister.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here