Money wise, does he have a big contract?
No-one on here, really knows anything about contracts. Its all guess work. Maybe one for Derek Allan
Money wise, does he have a big contract?
Sorry but that was a poor night's work from KLL, poor control, poor crossing, lack of marking and less said the better about the shooting. What ever he was told to do in the 1st half it was wrong as it left Chicksen exposed to 2 attacking Hull players as KLL was wandering all over the place, 2nd half he stayed wide which was abit better but then we had the falling over and the ref seemed to just get fed up with it and it was this that led to their goal as he went to ground too easily. We've seen this before when he starts matches so there must be a problem somewhere and OG is surely going to want a more consistant player on the left.
Whether he likes it or not he is currently much better against tired defences. While he can be effective when starting (the Palace and Wolves home matches spring to mind) these games are all too infrequent to warrant him a place in the starting XI. My worry with this though is that he'll become disillusioned and sulky with being used as an impact player and then leave at the end of the season for nothing, he needs a new contract asap. Was he one of the players who had bids turned down for in January? If so, this could possibly suggest the club will be offering a deal in the coming months.
He brings excitement when he comes on as a sub and irrestpective of him sulking or contract issues, it appears that he is best suited to a 30 - 45 minute role which he should recognise. Do you remember the supersub at Liverpool, Fairclough, had all the adulation, scored a lot of goals, but his role was as a sub. Its a squad game now and with three subs it give smore scope to managers.
This.
He does not have the stamina, focus or ability to play a 90 minute match and remain effective. His immaturity as a player comes through as he gets more tired and that's a shame. You can see him getting more and more frustrated as the game goes on. It's as if he knows he's not as good when he starts. The confidence isn't there.
I think he'll always be an impact player. And, to be honest, what an impact player he is. He terrifies defences when he comes on at 60 mins. I'd always want him in the squad for sure, just not starting.
We played 4231. It got players closer to Ulloa who most would agree has been too isolated in recent weeks. It also got the best out of Jake Forster-Caskey operating in the middle of the three.
It just meant we sacrificed a bit of width and that limited the impact of Lua Lua in wide areas. Certainly in the first half he wasn't playing wide by any stretch.
It wasn't his best game by any means but if you look at the bigger picture the tactics did get the best out of some of our other players.
What few people seem to realise is that opposition players are allowed to play well and sometimes
He brings excitement when he comes on as a sub and irrestpective of him sulking or contract issues, it appears that he is best suited to a 30 - 45 minute role which he should recognise. Do you remember the supersub at Liverpool, Fairclough, had all the adulation, scored a lot of goals, but his role was as a sub. Its a squad game now and with three subs it give smore scope to managers.
What few people seem to realise is that opposition players are allowed to play well and sometimes that will result in one of our players not having so much impact on the game.
Lua Lua is well in credit so far this season.
I do remember David Fairclough and also the Albion attempting to sign him but being thwarted by his £800 per week wage demands .
He was before my time but I can see comparisons between them. Unfortunately Kaz doesn't always appear to have the best of attitudes.
You can not compare Kas with Fairclough he scored game winning goals when he came on. Kas has not scored this season in the league.