Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
I think the good thing about yesterday is it shows teams that kicking LuaLua out of the game does not finish us as a team. We do have other options going forward so if LuaLua has a bad day or does not start.
Agreed. It wasn't a penalty and he didn't dive. Another very poor refereeing decision.
Think that is true as he was diving after every tackle and I know its controversial but in my opinion rightly booked for trying to get a penalty.
Rugrat, a player who had his leg broken just 10 months ago, is not going to wait a nano second for opponents to foul him just so that he can get a free kick. It is possible that following that injury he has lost some of his pace.
Have you seen the size of him? It doesn't take much for someone his size and with his speed to go down, I didn't think it was a penalty but neither do I think it was a dive.
Think that is true as he was diving after every tackle and I know its controversial but in my opinion rightly booked for trying to get a penalty.
Think that is true as he was diving after every tackle and I know its controversial but in my opinion rightly booked for trying to get a penalty.
I would deffo use Kaz as a sub, wot a player to bring on for last 30mins or so in a tight game
I agree,Kaz could unlock a tight game,teams have already worked out that Marcus and Kaz are liable against pace because Kaz does not give a lot in defence .IMO this part of his game has to be improved or else we shall see less and less of Kaz.