Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Sits back and waits for someone to start slagging off pedestrians .........
Joking aside, pedestrians staring at their phones with their ear pods in....danger to everyone!
Sits back and waits for someone to start slagging off pedestrians .........
Question for Stat Brother or someone who knows.
Driving along Lewes Road, Brighton, a bendy bus may start its journey through the lights on a green but by the time the end of the bus goes through the light is on red. If I stick beside the rear half of the bus and cross the line ahead of the bus, although technically I've run a red, can I get done for it as I'm ahead of the bus.
My point being that the lights in front of B&Q need to have longer on amber to allow these monsters to get through.
And you're seeing loads of cyclists doing over 20mph undertaking cars...
They've not got a car behind with matching livery to their kit with a load of spare bikes on top have they?
Joking aside, pedestrians staring at their phones with their ear pods in....danger to everyone!
No, that's not what I said at all. You suggested there would be no overtaking except of 'slow moving traffic', which you pegged as anything 'below 20mph'. I was just pointing out that there are lots of urban roads where 'below 20mph' is the safe limit.
'Proper' cyclists really are a funny breed. So defensive. If someone states 'some car drivers are shit', then everyone, including all the other car drivers will agree, and recount their encounters with shit drivers.
Suggest that 'some cyclists are shit', and the proper cyclists grab their pitchforks and rush out to light the beacons.
This is most certainly true and may cause a bump but no significant harm. Cyclists riding at speed on the pavements is a different story though. A young child or frail senior could be seriously injured (or worse) by these morons.
I'll tell you why cyclists in general are so defensive...
The general irritation that pervades the media, social media toward cyclists leads to anger and aggression from drivers toward cyclists on the road. They take risks that could kill me. Some of the gaps drivers leave, overtaking when unsafe, it's all linked. Simple as that.
So yeah, when it comes to it, the balance of the odd cyclists being a dick, whether jumping a light, undertaking is actually rarely going to lead to them hurting anyone else but themselves. Someone in a car being a dick has the capacity to kill multiple people.
The size of frustration at cyclists on our roads is so out of proportion with the danger posed by drivers on their phones, not indicating, poor driving, speeding, jumping lights etc. etc. as to make you wonder whether our transport would be transformed if we put all our energy into changing the driving culture of motor vehicles. As with [MENTION=22135]rippleman[/MENTION]'s post above, like many others he will be more annoyed at a bike on a pavement, than a vehicle doing 40 in a 30, a driver on their phone etc. etc. Totally out of proportion with the danger posed.
So yeah, I do light the beacons, because the 'some cyclists are shit' mentality has led to a culture of drivers hating cyclists. It's a problem. Being held up for an extra 20 seconds shouldn't be a cause of the hostility a vulnerable road user faces on our roads.
From 2012 to 2016, 2,120 pedestrians were killed by a vehicle in Britain—0.8% of these involved a bicycle.
You obviously know where to focus the attention for improved road safety to everyone using our roads or pavements.
I look forward to your many contributions to threads criticising drivers for speeding, jumping lights, using phones etc. I must of missed all the previous ones given your obvious concern for vulnerable road users.
Sorry - I understand all of that (as stated, I'm a cyclist as well as a motorist), but your reflex defense mechanisms are still ridiculous. Some cyclists really are shit / dangerous / inconsiderate. Railing against that simple statement of fact, is still weird.
We all know and accept that plenty of car drivers are shit / dangerous / inconsiderate. It isn't a competition.
I think the problem is that the shit cyclists regularly get discussed and the shit drivers don't.
Cough.....you’ve mentioned drivers using phones quite a few times ....I’ve witnessed cyclists likewise.
Turning to motorcyclists ...now they are the ones (with my drivers hat on) that scare me.
Ps I havnt anything against cyclists long as they play by the same rules as the rest of us...indeed on a Sunday I am one as I try and avoid the tin can
I think the problem is that the shit cyclists regularly get discussed and the shit drivers don't.
But you are stating they are!? They're obeying and breaking the same rules vehicle drivers do....
Only difference is drivers cause a gazillion more deaths and accidents than cyclists.
Maybe we need to focus on the drivers a bit more?
Or not, maybe you see a cyclist being a moron on their phone the same as you do a motorist. I don't, I see a) a moron riding their bike on their phone b) someone in a vehicle at speed who is going to kill someone or multiple people if they carry on doing that.
But people discuss shit drivers / driving ALL the time!
Well I was thinking that myself.....can’t think there’s a poster representing drivers who persistently has a go at drivers.
Cyclists are discussed a bit on here - almost always in threads like this very one, started BY paranoid cyclists having a pop at their imaginary demonisation.
What is your point?
Is there anyone here pretending that bad drivers don't break rules?
Cyclists are discussed a bit on here - almost always in threads like this very one, started BY paranoid cyclists having a pop at their imaginary demonisation.
Really.
What was your first post hans, about the danger and punishment of a driver running a red light, or straight onto cyclists?
Have you even mentioned the actual crime the thread alludes to?
Has anyone actually condemned the car driver running the red light, or any car drivers for that matter?
Paranoid you say...
Really....