On a level I agree, because none of us have properly seen what he can offer.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if that transfer doesn't work out.
He sure as hell doesn't look anything like the player in that montage, irrespective of the opposition.
I just don't understand the dogs abuse he's getting esp on the back of yesterday's team (and management) performance.
Oh do cut the crap. This is what you said:
Stat Brother said:I'm absolutely loving this new found FACT that:-
- he can't play as a loan striker
- he can't play 4-4-1-1
- he needs a big man up top with him.
- he can't defend.
If only there was some evidence to the contrary:-
You're not agreeing "on a level" at all - you're just self-righteously attempting to rubbish anyone who has been unimpressed with him whilst citing those reasons by posting an irrelevant video of him scoring goals against The Kings Arms.
And now you're saying he doesn't look like the player in the montage. No shìt sherlock. So why bother posting it then, FFS? What value did your post offer here if all you're going to do is tell everyone that the proof of him being a good player is in the montage and then an hour later apparently tell us that the player we've got doesn't look like the player in the montage? We KNOW that. So clearly you're wrong - that montage doesn't prove anything.
Meanwhile, people like you and [MENTION=12486]Husty[/MENTION] seem happy to consider these people idiots, yet haven't bothered to tell us what YOU DO actually see in him. Why don't either of you initiate a discussion by telling us where the chink of light might be, instead of tediously belittling those who are questioning his performances so far? Have some conviction in what you post instead of mindlessly bending with the wind every time someone calls you out for a crap post, and people might actually respect you for it.