Still come back to the signing of Ausilin why did we sig him on loan whenwe have plenty of wingers; unless one is going out on loan.
Because he is an attacking midfielder.
Still come back to the signing of Ausilin why did we sig him on loan whenwe have plenty of wingers; unless one is going out on loan.
am puzzled by the signing of another winger for the remainder of the season.
Cardiff apparently didnt offer a large enough transfer fee but if he went on loan with a view to possible purchase and they reached the Prem they may up their offer. If not we keep him or iif we reach the Prem and Gus thinks that he can do it for us. If he goes for anything like £1m it would be a great return on our initial investment.
I dont want him to go but am puzzled by the signing of another winger for the remainder of the season.
With respect, your argument is becoming more and more ridiculous. We don't want rid of Noone. Noone hasn't expressed any desire to go. So why on earth would we loan him to Cardiff, if they aren't willing to pay enough for us to say "ok, we'll take the money over having he player". Don't you see the lack of sense in saying "no, we won't take £1.2m for the guy we would really like to keep, but take him on loan so we lose the player we want to keep, and only save a couple of grand on his wages each week for only three months"?
/QUOTE]
Is it not possible that Cardiff came in with a price that was acceptable to Brighton but not in time to do the deal before the window closed so the only way to get around this is a loan with an agreement to buy during the summer.
Is it not possible that Cardiff came in with a price that was acceptable to Brighton but not in time to do the deal before the window closed so the only way to get around this is a loan with an agreement to buy during the summer.
It would be great (NOT) if Noone were to score the winner against us in the playoff final. Will never be allowed to happen.
As a loan player he couldnt play against us.
I think BG may be on to something here. Gus is shuffling the pack again looking for a bit extra whilst balancing the books. Hoskins went out on loan against the better judgement of the masses, so Noone to Cardiff is not that ridiculous. Granted the player and the fans are not particularly favourable to him moving to our rivals.
Possible? Yes. But unlikely. But agreeing a fee for a full transfer late is different to having every offer turned down and then deciding on a loan instead (which you initially suggested), or loaning with the chance of cancelling the transfer (which you suggested in the post I quoted). (Why would we loan a player we want to keep to a team who might not want to keep him if they don't go up, or who might not want him because they can get better when they do go up? What would that do to the player's confidence and feelings towards the club?).
But all reports out of both clubs are that no agreement was reached, Noone is staying. If we had reached an agreement, would he have played v millwall and risk injury? If we had reached an agreement, why is there no news today (apparently the first opportunity for teams that want to loan that includes play offs)?
With the 2 new loans now signed who, if anybody, are we likely to loan out.
I would suggest:
Noone to Cardiff
Harley
JFC
Adgestein
Barker
I said all along a loan to buy.
Let me say IO hope I am wrong but it wouldnt surprise me if it happened
I did yes but clarified it in my next post. These things do happen Spurs have just signed a Brazilian player agreed a fee etc but he is on loan because of the transfer windows. If the deal had been agreed by both clubs it could happen