Younger than me but only just. Enjoy the day and look forward to a bit of a review some point.
Will do. A bit of Guardian reading over breakfast will make it a perfect day
Younger than me but only just. Enjoy the day and look forward to a bit of a review some point.
You lucky get. Wish that gig didn't clash with Crystal Castles tomorrow night. Make sure you see AlunaGeorge as well. Hooray
I have to say Rufus was wonderfully on form. A thoroughly enjoyable gig. 2 Bears was slightly hindered by the Coalition doormen not letting a friend of mine in due to no photo ID; utter nonsense and totally inexplicable as my mate is the wrong side of 30 and has a friendly and totally unthreatening demeanour. This will be followed up. Union were good, AlunaGeorge will need another listen and 2 Bears were excellent and fun and took the party to another level.
As for your friend not being allowed in that does sound rather harsh. Surely if you have a ticket you should be allowed in?.
Agree. The ticket does actually state photo ID required but it is part of a sentence about over 18s. I have never been IDed at Coalition before and none of the rest of us where asked either. I'm pissed off and will look into this further.
A fair few venues check ID as standard on entry now - eg. Cargo - which leads to a lot of bemused people in their late twenties for whom the idea of having to provide idea seems like a distant memory. All rather over the top - but if says it on the ticket it's not entirely the venue's fault!
A fair few venues check ID as standard on entry
It says in very small print and as it is part of the "over 18" sentence could be construed as a requirement if you're challenged as opposed to a requirement for all. As I said not everyone was IDed. There is absolutely no way my friend could me seen as being under 18. Common sense could have prevailed? If you want my opinion the bouncer realised he had made a mistake but instead of accepting this and apologising and letting my mate in he didn't want to back down so maintained his stance no matter how ridiculous he was sounding; basically a bouncer being a bouncer.
It says in very small print and as it is part of the "over 18" sentence could be construed as a requirement if you're challenged as opposed to a requirement for all. As I said not everyone was IDed. There is absolutely no way my friend could me seen as being under 18. Common sense could have prevailed? If you want my opinion the bouncer realised he had made a mistake but instead of accepting this and apologising and letting my mate in he didn't want to back down so maintained his stance no matter how ridiculous he was sounding; basically a bouncer being a bouncer.
Frank Turner tonight for me and the missus at the Corn Exchange, really looking forward to it.
Its been moved to the Dome now by the way.