Blackcap
Member
They both weren't penalties IMO. Atwell lost control of the game and was conned by both Buckley and Zaha.
Yes exactly. Two non penalties, draw a fair result, lets move on.
They both weren't penalties IMO. Atwell lost control of the game and was conned by both Buckley and Zaha.
It depends if you think you can get away with it or not. It's cheating, but points count. If one of our players did that, and got away with it, I'd be glad for the points. But I'd recognise it for what it was, a cheating dive.If there is any contact in the box , no matter how minimal , you go down yes?
Because it was a dive. Sorry, are you a bit dim?So how is wilf a cheat !
And take away the goal. That would be funny.Was discussing with my Southampton supporting in-laws, and we agree that there should be a diving review panel.
If they decide retrospectively that somebody has dived its an automatic 3 match ban.
Should sort all these cheats out.
If there is any contact in the box , no matter how minimal , you go down yes? So how is wilf a cheat ! You would have be very dissapointed if buckley hadnt done this would'nt you !
.They both weren't penalties IMO. Atwell lost control of the game and was conned by both Buckley and Zaha.
Fans also cannot complain that the powers that be are trying to make it a non-contact sport, when that is simply a result of almost any contact resulting in players throwing themselves down claiming something for it.
They both weren't penalties IMO. Atwell lost control of the game and was conned by both Buckley and Zaha.
Ive watched it and i saw it in real time , from pretty much the same spot as the footage . I still say its a penalty , alough the contact was minimal . I did notice your players didnt go mad at wilf but seemed more annoyed with buckley ! who looked sheepish ! make of that what you want .
I wouldn't. I remember, even as a kid, watching John Robinson do his best to stay on his feet when he ran down the wing and defenders kept trying to take him out. I was disappointed when I saw him going down easily for Charlton.
Going down under minimal contact is cheating. No matter how many players do it. It is deceitful and disrespectful. All the while players are cheating and fans are fine with it, they have no right to criticise the refs, imo. If you're willing to support players as they throw themselves to the ground, you cannot expect referees to always get it right for fouls.
Fans also cannot complain that the powers that be are trying to make it a non-contact sport, when that is simply a result of almost any contact resulting in players throwing themselves down claiming something for it.
Not deluded just saying it as i saw it . We are both gonna see it differently because of who we support .Are you deluded? I've seen Albion players dive before - I get over it but I hold my hands up. Leon Knight was awful at it and funnily enough the other was Glenn Murray - always diving. You really have no leg to stand on here (excuse the punn) - It was a BLATANT act of cheating - and then celebrating to your fans after cheating a pen = poor form from Zaha.
I'd argue it's the other way. Players throw themselves to the floor at every given opportunity because the lawmakers have made it into such a slight contact sport. The fact that people try to justify fouls/penalties/cards by the merest hint of 'contact' back that up I think.
Someone snaps him ? Fuc king idiot !