Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
https://news.sky.com/story/gary-lin...elcome-a-refugee-to-live-in-his-home-12062112
Maybe we all should?
Maybe we all should?
Exactly. Lineker speaks the truth and the boorish ignoramuses don't like that much. Here he is with actions not words, you can bet the trolls don't respect him for it.Yep. Can't wait to see what all the people who get outraged at him having opinions they don't like will find next as a reason to try and claim his opinion doesn't matter.
Fair play to him.
Normally criticized for his Twitter interventions etc.....
Setting a presidence for all the rich spoilt b@stards
Producer: "Gary, I appreciate you wanted to bring along your new house-mate to the studios to see what you do on MoTD but we can't let him on the set looking like that. Plus nobody can understand a word he says."
Lineker: "That's Robbie Savage."
Are those divs that got so angry with Lineker still boycotting Walkers crisps?
He’s only doing it because he constantly bleats on about how refugees should be let in, so half of twitter said why doesn’t he put his ‘money where his mouth is’ so to speak, he makes like 3 million a year alone from BBC doesn’t he? Surely he could quite easily just pay for accommodation and other issues they face.
Seems like a publicity stunt to me, I know the migrant/refugee issue is a controversial and difficult one, and I myself am torn between believing these people need and deserve help and the unfortunate fact that if you allow a few, where do you draw the line? Lineker should stick to shitting on the floor
Even if those figures are correct, it's really not that many is it.Bit harsh. But case to be argued it’s backfired in so far as it shows how out of touch rich liberal elite are with the mainstream perhaps by doing this. Trouble is, he needs to find room for 700+ per week (PER WEEK!) to make a difference. Good luck with that Gary!
He’s only doing it because he constantly bleats on about how refugees should be let in, so half of twitter said why doesn’t he put his ‘money where his mouth is’ so to speak, he makes like 3 million a year alone from BBC doesn’t he? Surely he could quite easily just pay for accommodation and other issues they face.
Seems like a publicity stunt to me, I know the migrant/refugee issue is a controversial and difficult one, and I myself am torn between believing these people need and deserve help and the unfortunate fact that if you allow a few, where do you draw the line? Lineker should stick to shitting on the floor
Indeed. Although even taxing the super rich properly won't solve anything when the government itself has its grubby hands in the till.Useful in that it shuts up all those idiots who think they've won the argument when they say 'if you care so much why don't you let someone stay with you eh'
Shame though that such stupid, vacuous, levels of argument are being pandered to.
I don't think reponsible governments around the world generally seek to manage their obligations to people moving across borders (which has always happened, will always happen and has been a key part in the building of human civilizations across history) by asking people to voluntarily put them up in their houses.
The answer of course is to tax people like Lineker properly. And (amongst many other things we need to improve through taxation) pay for a humane, well managed and fair system to cope with the (relatively low) numbers of people that arrive on our shores seeking refuge, security, opportunity, better lives for their families etc.
Indeed. Although even taxing the super rich properly won't solve anything when the government itself has its grubby hands in the till.