brighton_tom
Well-known member
- Jul 23, 2008
- 5,633
Few bits on twitter, seems to stem from The Athletic, saying Colwill is out for about 4-6 weeks with this injury.
I heard two fans saying that he's out injured.Few bits on twitter, seems to stem from The Athletic, saying Colwill is out for about 4-6 weeks with this injury.
June 2023.When is JPvH's contract up?
Yes, but Webster needs 6 weeks to get back up to speed after all his injuries. I reckon we'll start with JP as RDZ calls him.We're fine. He's been great but only stepped into the starting 11 because Webster was injured, but he's back.
Webster does seem to take a while to get up to speed as well after injuries. But not sure how you get up to speed without playing…I’d go with Van Hecke. Thought he looked very assured and I am not a big fan of throwing centre backs straight back in the team when returning from injury.
I think I was hoping more of an easing back into things by u23s games as an overage player and a week or two more of quality training - but I absolutely trust whatever the manager decides. Just my thoughtsWebster does seem to take a while to get up to speed as well after injuries. But not sure how you get up to speed without playing…
In that case ......... whoops!June 2023.
Maybe it's a 'tactical' injury to put Chelsea off from recalling him - leaving him available to us for the rest of the season?
I don't think they would only sign a three-year-contract with a 19-year old like Hecke was when he was bought... I imagine there is definitely a clause to extend it 1-2 years.When is JPvH's contract up? .......and has he been offered a new contract, and is it a fact that he has refused to sign one, or is that just specuative rumour-mongering?
Certainly, if he walks out of the Albion on a free, that is a bad error by the club. Of there is officially actually no chance that we'll be allowed to buy Colwill, best send him back now, good as he is, and play JPvH and do whatever we can to make sure that even if we don't want to keep him, we get a good fee for him. Better than Ostigaard, IMHO - got to be worth £10M to somebody, shirley.
Ideally, we'd do both - buy Colwill and keep JPvH. After all, like it or not, Dunk isn't going to perform at top PL level for ever ...............
I hope you're right - I'm sure there is a PL player in there, even if not quite a top PL player, but still one worth several £million quid.I don't think they would only sign a three-year-contract with a 19-year old like Hecke was when he was bought... I imagine there is definitely a clause to extend it 1-2 years.
I think so as well but needs to get game time somehow somewhere. He's 22 and that is really a time when players need to play a bit.I hope you're right - I'm sure there is a PL player in there, even if not quite a top PL player, but still one worth several £million quid.
Harsh on Webster and I don’t know how you can rate JVH as better than him.JVH in for me. Looks better than webster what ive seen and webster coming back from injury is a calamity
Totally agree, whilst we need to develop we also we'd to maximize where we finish each seasonBut he’s exceptional.
Why limit / disadvantage ourselves for no reason. JPVH would have gone out on loan but he wouldn’t / won’t sign a long term deal