Kylies Stunt Arse
What?
Les Biehn said:I thought Hart had moved back to Essex recently?
He did. He did live a few doors from Mayo in Peacehaven, but since then Mayo has moved to Newhaven and Harty back to Essex.
Les Biehn said:I thought Hart had moved back to Essex recently?
KinkyHitler said:dont wat to make you both wrong, but you ae
Yorkie said:Chippy's interview in the Argus article
"If they feel people are pulling the wool over their eyes they won't accept it."
Kylies Stunt Arse said:No, we don't know the details of the sell on. Most sell on's are just for the next deal, some do have caveats about future deals, but only if the original buying club receives any money from these further deals.
We don't know the details of the sell on clauses, so we can't say for sure.
Yorkie said:"I'm not bothered. Leon's Leon and at the end of the day he has got himself a decent move...
...Put it this way, there's no hiding place down there. The fans, as passionate as they are, expect players to give no less than 100 per cent. If they feel people are pulling the wool over their eyes they won't accept it."
Les Biehn said:Also its clear Chippy (and probably the rest of the squad) feel that Leon wasn't pulling his weight.
gvce26 said:Newhaven and the Argus reported it as Newhaven!
B.M.F said:I thought Leons comments in the argus today shows how much he really felt for Brighton. I have not got the quote to hand but it was basically saying the fans and players are great.
Kylies Stunt Arse said:No, we don't know the details of the sell on. Most sell on's are just for the next deal, some do have caveats about future deals, but only if the original buying club receives any money from these further deals.
We don't know the details of the sell on clauses, so we can't say for sure.
Shropshire Seagull said:I agree than none of us know the detailed content of a sell-on clause. But it would be unworkable if it were to be for more than the players next move only. Here's why.
Lets say (hypothetically) that Chelsea have agreed a 50% sell-on for LK for ALL future moves. Lets also say that Brighton have also agreed a 50% sell-on for LK for ALL future moves. Next year Swansea sell LK and whatever the fee, Chelsea get 50% and so do Brighton - But Swansea (who would get othing at this point) also agreed a 50% sell-on for LK for ALL future moves. What happens next time? 3 clubs all can't have 50% - its not possible.
Also, I don't think this would be permitted under contract law. My guess is that any sell-on clause can ONLY be for the next sale.
KinkyHitler said:No it works like this
Leon moves to swansea for 125k
chelski get 50%
say brighton had 50% sell on
leon moves to huddersfield for 200k
brighton get 100k but have to give 50% to chelsea
KinkyHitler said:No it works like this
Leon moves to swansea for 125k
chelski get 50%
say brighton had 50% sell on
leon moves to huddersfield for 200k
brighton get 100k but have to give 50% to chelsea
zego said:Seems to be a lot of harsh criticism of Leon being posted - what short memories!
I have to agree the stats show he has not being getting enough goals this season, but I have only ever seen him work hard for the team (all at away games).
maybe more to it than ability and work rate - strikers by definition need feeding, and the right food.
I am reminded of Dean Saunders - clearly had ability when with us, but I have memories of him running his legs off trying to reach poorly weighted passes, or running into spaces that he could see but the midfielders didn't. Proved his class elsewhere for other clubs, and for Wales. Proving his ability to read a game as he progresses into management.
maybe this will happen with Leon.