120k a week plus £1.5 million loan fee....Yeah ok then!
Guillem Balague who is very reliable said it was with an option to buy, but that hasn't really been mentioned at this end.
https://twitter.com/GuillemBalague/...y|twsrc^android|twgr^copy|twcon^7090|twterm^2
Held together with weetabix.
£2m approx wages + £1.5m = £3.5m which to me is a good investment IF he can score the goals to keep you up.
and risk upsetting the dressing room as he would be on way more than anyone else.... Also, he will probably be in the treatment room for a good period of the loan period....
Did Bridge upset the dressing room as he was on proportionately more than Sturridge, the only down side would be his injury record.
City were paying most of his wages.... Liverpool want all wages covered? Big difference!
Fantastic business.
This has been an unprecedented January transfer window. Anyone who is underwhelmed by this should have a word with themselves.
But that aspect is nothing to do with his team mates as he is still getting the wages Liverpool could have said give us £3m loan fee and we ill pay his wages would that have been ok.
almost unprecedented. After all, we originally signed Ulloa on 16 January 2013 and Matthew Upson on 31 January 2013
Then we signed Dale Stephens on 30 January 2014, followed by Beram Kayal on 23 January 2015 and Anthony Knockaert on 7 January 2016
and back in the distant past we picked up Inigo Calderon on 7 January 2010
We're not that bad at the January transfer window malarkey really
No it wouldn't be ok! I have said that before....not too sure what your point is but Brighton will not be paying a player 120k a week to sit in the treatment room... I'm happy with that...
But that aspect is nothing to do with his team mates as he is still getting the wages Liverpool could have said give us £3m loan fee and we ill pay his wages would that have been ok.
Fantastic business.
This has been an unprecedented January transfer window. Anyone who is underwhelmed by this should have a word with themselves.