Birdie Boy
Well-known member
- Jun 17, 2011
- 4,394
Sounds like the plot to abducted in plain sight.
I just watched that as you mentioned it. Truly astonishing how the parents acted as well as the paedo.
Sounds like the plot to abducted in plain sight.
Lovely bloke, Dave! He's the Peter Pan of the neighbourhood. Sure, he has a playground in his back garden, a PS4 with 500 games, an ice cream van on the drive and a pet orang-utan called Schmubbles, but he just childlike and innocent. Why wouldn't we let the kids stay over in his one bedroom house?
Also- to the poster who suggested certain elements of society knowingly protected Savile- surely the same is true of Jackson's many hangers on? Let's take the "childlike" theory at face value. Did not ONE single person in his vast entourage think to suggest to him that sharing his bed with young boys might leave him open to accusations, or gold diggers? Were they all so afraid of losing their place in the giant hierarchy of ladder-climbing flunkeys that they couldn't even bring themselves to upset the status quo (and heaven knows, maybe save some children from a lifetime of despair) by mentioning it?
I just watched that as you mentioned it. Truly astonishing how the parents acted as well as the paedo.
I think the thing for me was the total willingness of many people to accept the Jackson side's argument that his behaviour could be explained by the fact that he was just a fragile, sweet Peter Pan sort of figure. There was never any denial on his part that those kids were sleeping in his bed, but even their parents (not to mention his hangers on) seemed perfectly happy to put it down to his supposed boy-who-never-grew-up personality.
Imagine your 40 something next door neighbour asks your nine year old son to stay overnight, and then tells you they're going to be sharing a bed, because he's just "childlike". Is anybody going to go "Yeah, go for it: but no fizzy drinks after 8pm!"?
Leaving Neverland, Channel 4, 9pm.
It's going to be grim.
Thanks, didn't see it.Fixtures.
Seriously?saw trailer for this, looks over-produced, like its actors.
I think the thing for me was the total willingness of many people to accept the Jackson side's argument that his behaviour could be explained by the fact that he was just a fragile, sweet Peter Pan sort of figure. There was never any denial on his part that those kids were sleeping in his bed, but even their parents (not to mention his hangers on) seemed perfectly happy to put it down to his supposed boy-who-never-grew-up personality.
Imagine your 40 something next door neighbour asks your nine year old son to stay overnight, and then tells you they're going to be sharing a bed, because he's just "childlike". Is anybody going to go "Yeah, go for it: but no fizzy drinks after 8pm!"?
Some people still think 9/11 was a hoax.Seriously?
He paid one of the abused children $23m to keep quiet.
I can’t be the only one that thinks his music is meh?
I'm sure most are ashamed of not realising what happened.The parents of these kids who let him get away with it should be ashamed of themselves.
No, they weren't being paid off, they were being naive, and their kids were telling them nothing was happening.Money more important than your kids wellbeing? Really?
It's the "hiding in plain sight" thing again isn't it. How R Kelly got away with what he was doing (allegedly) while writing songs about it is mind blowing.Honourable mention to R. Kelly this morning.
Before any Beatles fans bite: - Yes you're right. I am a music snob. Feel free to treat my opinions with distain. It's enough for me to know that I'm right without having to convince anyone else.
Leaving Neverland, Channel 4, 9pm.
It's going to be grim.