The Large One said:So are we mourning the passing of an institution, or the mourning the loss of a sub-culture?
I mean, Top of the Pops has always been cheesy, presented by naff DJs (save John Peel - and his ejection was outrageous), naff dance routines by cheesy dancers (albeit rather sexy, girl-next-door dancers), some naff bands, with some even naffer performances. It became the epitome of mass consumerism and the vehicle for avaricious record companies to position their puppets - sorry, acts - to their best advantage.
The mere fact that you had to have a record in the Top 20 (or Top 30 or Top 40) meant that these were records which were already popular, and could be considered 'safe' for attracting viewers.
Or are we mourning the fact that the once-exciting time of not knowing who was at what position in the charts until they were announced by Noel Edmonds or Tony Blackburn or Peter Powell or whoever have now gone, the charts being known well before the official announcement is made.
And the fact that, to get a record into the top 20 requires the kind of marketing muscle that the music industry cartel just won't let you in on (Seagulls Ska was a one-off fluke - not to be repeated). This, combined with the fact that (and I am sounding like an old fart here) every record sounds the same as the last makes for an uninspiring, insipid, puerile popular music industry devoid of any depth or imagination.
Even the acts of any note are only good for one album - maybe two, and they take two or three years to release it if there is a second one, and all because not necessarily a lack of talent on the part of the artist (although in some cases that may be true) but because the artists are beholden to the pony-tailed, coke-addled marketing men - parasites who are suffocating the very deep pool of talent that Britain is highly capable of producing.
That's why Top of the Pops is being stopped. It is now irrelevant.
Dies Irae said:you really are a fun guy aren't you
The Large One said:So are we mourning the passing of an institution, or the mourning the loss of a sub-culture?
I mean, Top of the Pops has always been cheesy, presented by naff DJs (save John Peel - and his ejection was outrageous), naff dance routines by cheesy dancers (albeit rather sexy, girl-next-door dancers), some naff bands, with some even naffer performances. It became the epitome of mass consumerism and the vehicle for avaricious record companies to position their puppets - sorry, acts - to their best advantage.
The mere fact that you had to have a record in the Top 20 (or Top 30 or Top 40) meant that these were records which were already popular, and could be considered 'safe' for attracting viewers.
Or are we mourning the fact that the once-exciting time of not knowing who was at what position in the charts until they were announced by Noel Edmonds or Tony Blackburn or Peter Powell or whoever have now gone, the charts being known well before the official announcement is made.
And the fact that, to get a record into the top 20 requires the kind of marketing muscle that the music industry cartel just won't let you in on (Seagulls Ska was a one-off fluke - not to be repeated). This, combined with the fact that (and I am sounding like an old fart here) every record sounds the same as the last makes for an uninspiring, insipid, puerile popular music industry devoid of any depth or imagination.
Even the acts of any note are only good for one album - maybe two, and they take two or three years to release it if there is a second one, and all because not necessarily a lack of talent on the part of the artist (although in some cases that may be true) but because the artists are beholden to the pony-tailed, coke-addled marketing men - parasites who are suffocating the very deep pool of talent that Britain is highly capable of producing.
That's why Top of the Pops is being stopped. It is now irrelevant.
That was merely a piece of observation on the dreadful state of our popular music culture - nothing to do with whether I am fun or not. Of course, if you find that being bombarded with utterly unlistenable drivel is your bag, I can see why you would say that. Meanwhile, do you reckon you can take up the challenge and attempt to answer the two questions I posed in that observation?Dies Irae said:you really are a fun guy aren't you
The Large One said:That was merely a piece of observation on the dreadful state of our popular music culture - nothing to do with whether I am fun or not. Of course, if you find that being bombarded with utterly unlistenable drivel is your bag, I can see why you would say that. Meanwhile, do you reckon you can take up the challenge and attempt to answer the two questions I posed in that observation?
Two questions within one statement.Stinkers Bridge said:I can only see 1 question in your articulate observation.
The Large One said:That was merely a piece of observation on the dreadful state of our popular music culture.
The Large One said:Two questions within one statement.
'So are we mourning the passing of an institution, or the mourning the loss of a sub-culture?
Yeah, I can see what you mean, though.
Stinkers Bridge said:I was always betta at Maffs and stuff anyway.
The Large One said:That was merely a piece of observation on the dreadful state of our popular music culture - nothing to do with whether I am fun or not. Of course, if you find that being bombarded with utterly unlistenable drivel is your bag, I can see why you would say that. Meanwhile, do you reckon you can take up the challenge and attempt to answer the two questions I posed in that observation?
Dies Irae said:there you go again. patronising.....
FFS The thread was about mourning the passing of something lots of us found a part of our childhood.
If you feel the need to be all pretentious and clever, then that is your perogative, but just dont aim it at me.
Dies Irae said:....not really ( although it is raining and hot in North London)
It just gets me that that anytime a thread appears about something that people can reminiss about or about music or MP3 playersetc etc, it degenerates into " I can write more cleverer than you" shite, be it TLO, LI, UB etc etc...
This board got like this a few years ago and I feel it degenerating again.
Anyway I am FLOUNCING for a few weeks to Austria so wont be on here.
Dies Irae said:.Anyway I am FLOUNCING for a few weeks to Austria so wont be on here.
Tony Meolas Loan Spell said:Actually hasn't popular music always been crap? whether its the 60s 70s 80s 90s or now?
Oh I dont like all that mersey beat stuff I prefer Lou Reed or whatever.
I dont like all that Glam Rock I like punk.
I dont like all that Wham stuff I like Morrissey etc