thinking on, i reckon the Olympics, TdF etc could have a separate section, for drug ONLY contestants..
imagine the 100 metres in 5 seconds, or watching whole TdF in a day, rather than 3 weeks..
Sadly I don't have your faith.Not Guilty Livestrong .
Is he finally about to be found out as a drug cheat ?
BBC Sport - Lance Armstrong charged by US Anti-Doping Agency
I am not saying that Lance Armstrong used drugs BUT what Lance wants everyone to believe is that despite having had testicular, brain and lung cancer he was able to win probably the toughest sporting contest (Tour de France) seven times in a row despite the fact that most of his competitors at the time WERE taking performance enhancing drugs.
He is either by a massive margin the greatest athlete in all eternity or another cyclist who was taking performance enhacing drugs like most of the others at that time.
Gosh, it's tough to know where to begin with that list.the very best don't need to cheat,bobet,anquetil,merckx,hinault,lemond,fignon,indurain and of course armstrong
armstrong just happened to be the "best" of the best
This is just not the case.However if it emerges that he used drugs that were performance-enhancing but legal at the time (before loopholes were closed or whatever) I think you have to go with that. It might be viewed as sharp practice, not in the true spirit of the sport, but if it's legal or was at the time then why not.
The problem is, the one where they were clean would be full of cheats.I think we need two competitions for each sport. One where the athletes are clean of all drugs and one where they can f*** themselves up on what ever they want.
Lance needs to be sectioned
Lance the cyclist.
Lance the cancer survivor.
Lance the fund raiser.
Lance uses the other 2 to defend his cycling, which then brings more unwanted attention to the obvious positives his story has.
This is just not the case.
Lance is being investigated for using EPO, which is and was illegal, due to what it does to you red blood cell count. (The oxygen carrying ones).
The anecdotal evidence is pretty damning, but hard to prove as it's his word and others.
The others being proven cheats and liars.
With he exception of George Hincapie, he holds he key. His Grand Jury evidence makes or breaks Lance.
Until that is known, I'll not jump up and down on Lance, although I have made it pretty clear, who I believe.
I hope they have some very strong evidence because if not his name doesn't need to be dragged through the mud again!
Your blood must look a lot like red Golden Syrup.Don't think I'll bother to enter to TdF any time soon - I inject EPO every 2 weeks. Then again, maybe they wouldn't spot it for several years during testing !!
Your blood must look a lot like red Golden Syrup.
What truth?
I find it very strange that someone who'd been tested hundreds, maybe even thousands of times over those years never returned a positive test.
Don't you find that slightly strange?