Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Respect to him after coming clean, still an incredible athlete
Friday night
Respect to him after coming clean, still an incredible athlete
What a dick!!During part two, in which he fought back tears as he discussed the impact on his family, he revealed...
he wants the life ban in sports lifted but accepts that is unlikely
he feels "disgraced, humbled and ashamed" by his actions
his "most humbling moment" was being asked to step aside by cancer charity Livestrong
the moment he confessed to his son and said: "don't defend me anymore"
his actions had left his mother a "wreck"
his sponsors leaving him was a "$75m day"
The most amusing thing for me is that the preceding years before this, when he was winning, the amount of people who followed cycling world wide wasn't exactly huge in the English speaking nations.
Since this has come out its amazing how many arses that never followed the sport previously all of a sudden had an opinion.
Respect to him after coming clean, still an incredible athlete
There I am, swimming along, and I see this lovely, juicy bug. I was just about to gulp the lot down when my mate Bold Seagull pointed out the hook. Thanks Bold Seagull, I owe you one.Friday night
But this is a massive story in sport in general. How many other top athletes doped to win?Since this has come out its amazing how many arses that never followed the sport previously all of a sudden had an opinion.
Saw it in the NY times a while ago, although within an article, similar version on the Beeb. (scroll down to the bottom)Old, but may not have been picked up:
Top Finishers of Tour de France Tainted by Doping - Graphic - NYTimes.com
But this is a massive story in sport in general. How many other top athletes doped to win?
Well I guess we'll never really know. We only know about Lance because it was a team sport with an individual winner, so Lance needed his team mates to dope too, meaning a lot of people knew the truth. We can of course keep asking Carl Lewis if he doped, but there's quite a lot of incentive for him to say no.Until other sports have such "strict" doping control we won't know.
Well I guess we'll never really know. We only know about Lance because it was a team sport with an individual winner, so Lance needed his team mates to dope too, meaning a lot of people knew the truth. We can of course keep asking Carl Lewis if he doped, but there's quite a lot of incentive for him to say no.
You take that back!What is to say Sally Gunnell want Hudson blood transfusions and EPO during her successful years (as an example)?
Well I guess we'll never really know. We only know about Lance because it was a team sport with an individual winner, so Lance needed his team mates to dope too, meaning a lot of people knew the truth. We can of course keep asking Carl Lewis if he doped, but there's quite a lot of incentive for him to say no.
I believe they (actually one man, rather than the organisation) did retest the '84 samples, and the results were so bad he thought it would serve no purpose to release them. I suspect a vast number of winners were doping.Regarding Carl Lewis we can continue to ask him, and others racing at the time. We can retest samples from '84 and '88 for things that weren't detectable at the time.
I believe they (actually one man, rather than the organisation) did retest the '84 samples, and the results were so bad he thought it would serve no purpose to release them. I suspect a vast number of winners were doping.
But this is a massive story in sport in general. How many other top athletes doped to win?
The most amusing thing for me is that the preceding years before this, when he was winning, the amount of people who followed cycling world wide wasn't exactly huge in the English speaking nations.
Since this has come out its amazing how many arses that never followed the sport previously all of a sudden had an opinion.