[Albion] Lampoonery on NSC...

[Thunder Bolt]

I think the Duffy one started with something like... "I thought I should start a thread about one of the few players yet to be criticised this evening..."

I was also simultaneously posting on other threads where I was being positive about our players.

With hindsight, on an evening when Dale Stephens and Pascal Gross were fair game I should not have assumed that criticism of Duffy, Ryan and Propper would be transparently ridiculous...

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

The Duffy one was the easiest to spot when you titled it Shame Duffy.

 

[LamieRobertson]

The Duffy one was the easiest to spot when you titled it Shame Duffy.

Yes I thought that was clever.....but is the serious thread?

 

[darkwolf666]

This is precisely my point about lampoonery.

Is it impossible on NSC?

I tried really hard to signal that my posts were jokes and taking the piss out of the kneejerk critics but I seem to have failed almost completely.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

If the multiple slagging off posts was your attempt at humour you failed dismally, don't give up the day job...!

 

[Cheshire Cat]

The whole point of NSC is that while we might support Brighton, we don't all necessarily enjoy it.

 

[darkwolf666]

Me, I'm not buying it. I think you were being serious and you expected people to back you up as we had just been stuffed. Unfortunately for you, you didnt get the comfort you required, so now you are saying it was just a bit of "banter" and everyone who thinks otherwise is a moron!

Just kidding... or am I.

 

[Dave the OAP]

 

[Me and my Monkey]

The whole point of NSC is that while we might support Brighton, we don't all necessarily enjoy it.

Don’t enjoy supporting Brighton, or don’t enjoy NSC?

 

[theboybilly]

You're no Ernest that's for sure

 

[HastingsSeagull]

Maybe he's 'just having his views' as seemed to be popular for a period years ago.

Oh and not buying it at all (although this MAY not be serious and I MAY be fishing in a small pond)

 

[junior]

You're a comedy genius.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

If you have to explain that you're using lampoonery, then you're probably doing it wrong.

 

[Dolph Ins]

I find after a match we have lost it is best to click cancel rather than send after writing a comment. Next morning you are good to go again.

 

[Moshe Gariani]

Yet you seem to have taken my Glenn Murray post as having a go at him.

I’ll add giveaway smilies in future to save you looking like a moron or something.

No need to justify your TROLLING.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

 

[Durlston]

So you were pissed? As someone who hardly touches the demon drink I really thought you were being a miserable sod or attention seeking. Either way it was extremely annoying and tiresome.

 

[Bold Seagull]

What are you going on about?

No one bit on your Shame Duffy thread, and those that replied joked amoung themselves.

 

[Moshe Gariani]

What are you going on about?

No one bit on your Shame Duffy thread, and those that replied joked among themselves.

Why did you feel the need to chip in with these words of wisdom...?

1. I've explained that the main aim was to lampoon the kneejerk critics and make a joke at their expense - I didn't want anyone else to "bite" and did nothing to encourage that.

2. In the interests of accuracy you could look again at the Duffy thread and see the several unpleasantly personal and aggressive responses.

Can people stop posting bollocks about this, please? Unless they are LAMPOONING. [emoji846]



Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

 

[Bozza]

Curry anyone?

 

[Titanic]

Are you LAMB BHUNA-ING?

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

WARNING WARNING THIS POST MAY NOT CONTAIN SERIOUS CONTENT

PLEASE CONSIDER THIS BEFORE REPLYING


Now if this could be a template to be inserted in such circumstances as the OP is alluding to, there would be no problems

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

That is the RIGHT answer. And it points me at a deeper truth... I didn't do that, or add a giveaway smiley, as I did want to wind up what I thought would be a very few people MORONIC enough to even consider that such posts could be serious. So I guess I was FISHING a bit in a small pond.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

The trouble is that sometimes folk who generally come across as 'normal' will reveal their inner numpty by posting something jaw droppingly idiotic. Also, I can think of one poster who has a thematic comedy persona, and yet posts seemingly serious polictical posts that beggar belief. I can't work out whether he's a comedy genius, troll or idiot. Possibly all three.