Can you explain why? Doing 110 doesn't suddenly mean you're endangering life.Stupid logic.
Can you explain why? Doing 110 doesn't suddenly mean you're endangering life.Stupid logic.
Driving like what? Perhaps there's some evidence of him driving really badly, in which case, ok, fair enough (etc). All I know so far is that he was doing 110 in a 70.He wasn't though was he. What a ridiculous statement.
1) Wasn't done for speeding
2) Would have probably have been done in Germany for driving like that.
Driving like what? Perhaps there's some evidence of him driving really badly, in which case, ok, fair enough (etc). All I know so far is that he was doing 110 in a 70.
Fair point, he may have been doing less than 110. So what evidence are people using, apart from the fact that he was speeding? Doing over 100 would count as undue care and attention from the police, so is there anything showing it was more than that?Afraid you don't know that. All you know is that is how fast the Police drove to catch up with him.
Firstly, he's a complete knob and probably realizes that now.
However, there does appear to be some holes in the info, possible in the actual facts or possible in the dire reporting.
Nowhere does it state what speed he was actually doing yet many are banging on about him doing over 40mph above the limit. The article only states that it was the Police that drove at 110mph to catch him up! If they were waiting at the side of the road then of course they are going to have to drive faster to catch him up!
Find it odd that they were not able to record his speed as I thought all traffic cops had cars with equipment in them to identify the speed plus dash cams to record and provide evidence of the manner of driving. Not like the old days with a radar gun. It seems he was convicted purely on the manner of his driving, ie tailgating. For all we know he might have been doing 85mph. Still breaking the law but hardly excessive.
As for the club, I would very much suspect they are dealing with this and no doubt the player liaison officer is involved. I would hardly expect the club to broadcast how they deal with matter internally!
The other thing is that it was described as a police chase which I would understand is when someone tries to evade the Police. Doesn't sound like this was actually the case.
"The police reached a speed of 110mph as they were trying to catch the black car," said Mr Day.
"They were unable to reduce the distance between them."
Driving like what? Perhaps there's some evidence of him driving really badly, in which case, ok, fair enough (etc). All I know so far is that he was doing 110 in a 70.
Fair point, he may have been doing less than 110. So what evidence are people using, apart from the fact that he was speeding? Doing over 100 would count as undue care and attention from the police, so is there anything showing it was more than that?
Well the prosecutor said that. Maybe they were reducing the distance, but not quicklyThe article actually says, if I am reading correctly (as you say reporting is a bit crap), that the police were unable to reduce the distance between them and his car, despite the police reaching speeds of 110mph, which implies AK was driving at a similar speed:
Could you give me the minimum definition of 'weaving' please?The article says he was "weaving through the road and using excessive speed and tailgating".
Yes, I notice some of those who suggested we get rid after his sending off have the knives out again
Could you give me the minimum definition of 'weaving' please?
Obviously going 100 is excessive, but not necessarily risking life.
I guess I'm the only one here who's ever been speeding (a confession, not a brag, for those too stupid to tell).
All I know so far is that he was doing 110 in a 70.
Perhaps there's some evidence of him driving really badly, in which case, ok, fair enough (etc).
It's with remarkable consistency that the same old dick heads who have been calling him for to be axed because he's not 'PL quality' are the ones with the knives out in this thread with the odd exception.
Stephens and many others all in that same ball park. It’s the going PL rate.
He is one of the most exciting players I've seen play for the Albion.
Doesn't make him any less of a knob for driving like that.
In my ideal world he'd receive a ban from driving, be exposed to the consequences of driving like that and score a hattrick on the first day of the season.
Surely your gripe is with the legal system.
Otherwise you're just going to have to move past this and support the bloke.
Huddersfield don't have a player on more than 10k a week.
Don't believe that
Never understood that argument. I'm quite free to pass down my own judgement of dickhead.
Not your call.
Well you should as it's fact.
Huddersfield Town have capped their wages at £10k per week.
https://sillyseason.com/salary/huddersfield-town-players-salaries-104163/