knight in or out

[theonesmith]

Where do we start.

Sacking Wilkins.
Sacking Adams.
Adams having to buy short term (loan) replacements.
The above decisions also look like putting us into DIV 4 so will cost us revenue from lack of tickets purchased.

Then getting a 22000 seater stadium in a division that will not bring in the supporters only initially, could just cost us ADMINISTRATION,then will Knight be a hero or an arshole, get him upstairs now if you want his Lordship protected from humiliation and get a fresh leader who can handle managers correctly.

So potentially Millions of pounds.



Knights only hope is Slade can pull a bunny from a hat.

Oh do you not want the stadium then?

 

[Ernest]

Pillock.

Who Dick Tight ?

 

[Deleted member 2719]

Oh do you not want the stadium then?

Of course i want the stadium i just don't want to see our beloved club debts spiralling out of control because we are playing below Championship level and therefore not making maximum revenue.

The stupid thing about this is Dick stuck Dean in with a chance to build his squad (which he had been doing at youth level) and get them prepared for sustained championship football and then he chopped both of his legs from under him.

Like i have said make no mistake the decision to rid Wilkins looks like costing us Millions.

 

[SICKASAGULL]

Just how long should Knight be given because he saved the club?, He has had over ten years and the last three have been chronic, are we waiting until the club is in the Conference?, anything is better than the present situation.

 

[Brighton Breezy]

IF, and it is a big IF, there is anyone who wants to take over who would be ok then by all means it is time to step down.

Knight's biggest mistake was not doing more to get Coppell to stay.