[Misc] King Charles has cancer

[dazzer6666]

It isn't.

Our cancer detection rates are so bad in this country, millions will be making the same comparison.

All of my older family members were/are staunch royalists. They've said the same tonight.

The reality is that Charles statistically has a far better chance of survival the vast majority of the population because of private care, early diagnosis and treatment.

Them the facts.

See #55

 

[peterward]

Why? It’s pretty clear he’ll get through it. Hundreds of people get this news every day. He’s at the front of the queue for treatment isn’t he?

I wish King well and am not making light of this heinous disease, but I'm genuienly not sure he'll even be in a queue?, not like he's going to be added to the Windsor general hospital waiting list.

He'll be off to Harley Street to see the countries leading oncologists, no doubt?

 

[The Clamp]

Well, nobody wants to hear they have cancer.

I doubt in the moment it’s any less scary for him as it would be any of us.

I’m pretty sure his reaction to

“I’m afraid it’s cancer”

wasn’t

“Oh well. I’m rich”

Get well soon. Poor old bugger.

 

[Triggaaar]

As for anyone with C, wishing Charlie a full recovery.

If Putin develops cancer, you take that back

 

[hart's shirt]

The fact that Charles is King doesn't make me wish him any more or any less good health than anyone else with the disease.

Whilst I appreciate that he is clearly at an advantage with regards to healthcare, cancer itself doesn't discriminate.

The openness with which things are being discussed is commendable and will hopefully encourage others.

Royalist, Republican or somewhere in the middle, one can hope for a speedy recovery regardless.

 

[Guinness Boy]

It isn't.

Our cancer detection rates are so bad in this country, millions will be making the same comparison.

All of my older family members were/are staunch royalists. They've said the same tonight.

The reality is that Charles statistically has a far better chance of survival the vast majority of the population because of private care, early diagnosis and treatment.

Them the facts.

Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

But true

There is little if anything to choose between a private and NHS cancer pathway in terms of speed of treatment, in fact some local private hospitals will transfer patients back to the NHS.

The NHS will do their utmost to get patients a treatment decision within 28 days and first definitive treatment within 62 days.

 

[The Clamp]

Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.

Long term, you’re right.

I just think we should first and foremost treat him as a person. In this situation.

Scary to be told you have cancer.

 

[clapham_gull]

Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.

Having lived and breathed the terrible fall out of a missed diagnosis of a family member (one of the reasons I am yet to return to the Amex since pre-pandemic) I very much get it and will continue to post what I like.

The main reason the Palace released this news was to add to the conversation and this is the conversation.

Get well soon Charles, anyone with half a brain cell knows this isn't about him as a person.

 

[dazzer6666]

Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.

Ah, but you were going to ‘leave it there’ half an hour ago

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

It isn't.

Our cancer detection rates are so bad in this country, millions will be making the same comparison.

All of my older family members were/are staunch royalists. They've said the same tonight.

The reality is that Charles statistically has a far better chance of survival the vast majority of the population because of private care, early diagnosis and treatment.

Them the facts.

If it’s detected early enough it is, the actual treatment side as per my earlier post is comparable.

That is why screening has an important role and things like Targeted Lung Health Checks and FIT are very important.

The whole because he’s the King argument is basically bollocks. Early detection is the issue, if anyone has a raised PSA and see the GP, they’ll get referred, and likely to get an MRI after inspection.

I am sure Charles like anyone else had an MRI and thankfully it has showed an associated issue at an early stage.

 

[The Clamp]

I know people with plenty of money and had all the care in the world. They died of cancer.

Cancer doesn’t check your bank balance.

Yes, he’ll likely get the best care available.

Doesn’t help that much with cancer.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

1 in 2 people will be diagnosed with cancer.

About 67% of cancer survivors have survived 5 or more years after diagnosis. About 18% of cancer survivors have survived 20 or more years after diagnosis. 64% of survivors are age 65 or older.

 

[wellquickwoody]

Why? It’s pretty clear he’ll get through it. Hundreds of people get this news every day. He’s at the front of the queue for treatment isn’t he?

Pretty clear he will get through it? Time you shut your big trap.

 

[clapham_gull]

If it’s detected early enough it is, the actual treatment side as per my earlier post is comparable.

That is why screening has an important role and things like Targeted Lung Health Checks and FIT are very important.

The whole because he’s the King argument is basically bollocks. Early detection is the issue, if anyone has a raised PSA and see the GP, they’ll get referred, and likely to get an MRI after inspection.

I am sure Charles like anyone else had an MRI and thankfully it has showed an issue at an early stage.

Irrelevant to what happened to us and the fall out was horrific. I'm not going into details and neither am I going to be lectured regarding "early detection".

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Irrelevant to what happened to us and the fall out was horrific.

I don’t know your circumstances, but in relation to what you’ve responded to and this thread, what I’ve posted is fact.

 

[Nobby]

I wish King well and am not making light of this heinous disease, but I'm genuienly not sure he'll even be in a queue?, not like he's going to be added to the Windsor general hospital waiting list.

He'll be off to Harley Street to see the countries leading oncologists, no doubt?

Yep
But the thing is his cancer cells don’t know he’s the King

 

[Thunder Bolt]

I know people with plenty of money and had all the care in the world. They died of cancer.

Cancer doesn’t check your bank balance.

Yes, he’ll likely get the best care available.

Doesn’t help that much with cancer.

That’s why I made the point about King George VI dying at 52, and looked up Princess Margaret who died at 71.
of course, they both smoked but all the money and top doctors couldn’t allow them to live longer.

 

[Weststander]

One nonsense thing on the BBC News just now, the presenter suggested that the heavy workload since becoming king might’ve brought about the disease, a view then kind of shared by the posh ‘royals expert’.

No one will ever know. Long term stress may well be a factor for anyone, but what a silly proposition at this moment.

 

[AmexRuislip]

Irrelevant to what happened to us and the fall out was horrific. I'm not going into details and neither am I going to be lectured regarding "early detection".

I don't think that @One Teddy Maybank is lecturing you.
They're just stating a fact that if you have a suspected cancer, then early screening is a great option for ALL.