desprateseagull
New member
what i dont understand is WHY the CSO's were sent to start with, to a situation where they awere 'not allowed' to do anything that could really help?
water and kids drowning deserved a full fledged response, not a half hearted go see whats up approach..
as the younger kid was rescued by some fishermen, wouldn't it follow that the other person would be close by..?
Either CSO's need to be given mmore/better training, or scrap the lot and have staff who are more able/inclined to do the right thing.. you can argue toss re health/safetty later..
last thought- why were the kids allowed out by such a 'dangerous' spot, in the first place??
water and kids drowning deserved a full fledged response, not a half hearted go see whats up approach..
as the younger kid was rescued by some fishermen, wouldn't it follow that the other person would be close by..?
Either CSO's need to be given mmore/better training, or scrap the lot and have staff who are more able/inclined to do the right thing.. you can argue toss re health/safetty later..
last thought- why were the kids allowed out by such a 'dangerous' spot, in the first place??
Last edited: