- Aug 7, 2003
- 8,092
I think his body language was down to the fact he was the only one still trying with 10 minutes left to play. The rest of th team were pretty much on the coach!!
That's unfair on CMS
I think his body language was down to the fact he was the only one still trying with 10 minutes left to play. The rest of th team were pretty much on the coach!!
Is anyone happy at the club at the moment. Very strange considering we have great stadium new training ground but everyone is either resigning, wanting away or miserable at having to stay.
That's unfair on CMS
His body language and facial expressions Sunday suggests he is/was seriously hacked off over something. I thought it may have been the decision to start with a clearly unfit Buckley rather than him. I now believe it probably goes deeper. The next manager will have to decide if he wants to retain his undoubted ability to change games and work on his temperament, or let him go. Would love it if his attitude was managed effectively and he became the team player hes capable of being.
I suspect the club are aware that someone wants to buy him so extend the contract so they have to pay. Release him and the club may get nothing?
Probably because now a team is going to have to pay a fee and he'll lost out on a big signing on bonus.
The club need to ban him on Twitter, simple.
He's only got himself to blame, he agreed the original deal. Effectively it might as well be a clause that says 'he's for 4 years unless we decide to release him after 3'
I think his body language was down to the fact he was the only one still trying with 10 minutes left to play. The rest of th team were pretty much on the coach!!